Ask500

| Login

With the economy as bad as it seems, do you think a charismatic political leader could be granted too much power like Hitler? Ask a Question

McCain won't win, so why would we worry about that? :)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

I don't think this question was necessarily about McCain / Obama. Anyway to compare Obama with Hitler, I'm sorry, I think you should take a better look at history to see how far away from the truth that is.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Im not absolutely sure but I think, German chancellors have far less authority/power than president of the US. For starters they cant veto or propose bills, they merely choose the people responsible for proposing the bills to the parliaments.

Our styles of goverments cannot be compared directly, since our heads of states (Presidents, Kings) are just for show with no actual "power".

It is going to happen again some where, some day. History repeats it self, and we as a species refuse to learn from it.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Or as George Santayana put it, "Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat it."

Anything is possible if there enough people to want it...good example is our founding fathers and the American Revolution.

You don't need a bad economy for that - a terrorist "threat" might do the same, or "wapens of mass destruction".

That's what happened with The Patriot Act. He was at a near 90% approval rating when it passed. Lucky us - the arrogance, the lack of charisma and the checks and balances of the US Constitution held despite Bush's attempts to undermine the very foundations of it. Palin's mention of support for LEGISLATIVE powers for the Vice President is proof of how precarious a position the Constitution is in AND how precious the document truly is. It's the only thing that stands between our freedom and tyranny.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Well, I had my cell phone tapped and all my personal conversations recorded because the number had belonged to a drug dealer before me. The FBI conveniently expanded that authority from terrorists to basically anyone they may even suspect has committed a crime. That was nice. And I'm sure they didn't get a court order because a judge would have laughed them out of court.

ANYONE, who has even been charged with a crime will not be allowed into the EU and Canada because shortly their name will be on a list allowed by the Patriot Act. So if you plan to travel in the next couple of years I hope you were never arrested at a student protest in the sixties.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

The FBI called me. Jonmarc, I don't mind your attacking me, but could you make more sense? You just let your anger get hold of you and you lose your ability to think rationally and make a cogent statement or argument.

Keep up the good work not doing "criminal things" because the list is getting longer. Dont forget that laws are in the works and people have been arrested for what they say on the internet, so you may be closer than you think.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

The FBI called to tell you they were calling your calls but it was all a mistake?

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Look, Skippy. You asked for someone to tell you how they personally lost freedoms because of the Patriot Act and she did. So just man up and admit that you were wrong.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

She was wiretapped without a warrant, and you say she didn't lose any of her freedoms?! As Benjamin Franklin said, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." But to your larger point.

• The law allows secret searches of any home or business by federal agents, with no deadline to notify the owners or occupants that a search has taken place. This has been used against innocent citizens.

• It authorizes collection of personal information from libraries, businesses and medical providers even if there is no evidence of any connection with terrorism. And those ordered to supply the information are barred from letting anyone know that Big Brother is engaging in such activities.

• The law defines domestic terrorism so broadly it could be applied to completely unrelated acts, even peaceful protests.

Cool quotes! Doesn't apply! Give me someone who has been jailed or even questioned by it.

Of course it applies. Do you think that because you don't know anyone personally who has been the victim of one of these provisions that it will never happen? Is that what they taught you in Ostrich School?

That's how the end begins, Jonmarc. "Well, I'm not Jewish ... so what do I care that they're arresting the Jews?"

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

"yet"? The point is the Constitutional right of habeas corpus should stand at ALL times. THAT is how you keep the downward slide from starting. Security writs, willful destruction of judicial oversight, usurpation of habeas corpus, presidential signing statements claiming he should be allowed to function outside of the nation's laws while acting WITHIN the nations borders - THAT is how you end up with a totalitarian regime in place.

To give you an idea of what I mean about the spiral down and the precarious position our Constitution is in right now, honestly answer this question:

If Obama was elected president by the majority of the people come November and Bush refused to surrender the office, instead calling for another election sometime in February, what would you do?

I HONESTLY believe you'd smile and think to yourself: "Oh, that Bush! He's such a smart guy!" Then you'd wait for February.

Wow, did you get out of the wholesale business and go back to school? Law school? :)

Here's a map I played with today. Made me very happy:

http://news.yahoo.com/election/2008/dashboard

I do get a bug up my arse on occasion, don't I? (lol)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Unlike some people, who can only repeat Hannity and ElRushbo talking points, and take pride in calling themselves, "Ditto" heads.

;>)

She didn't say we are close to that scenario yet... she said, "that's how it begins." Doh.

Gosh you are so smart for pointing that out... Doh!

Bush, with the help of the White House legal staff has consistently made an effort to undermine the Congress by signing bills they have passed and then ignoring all or part of them based upon "his" interpretation of the Constitution. Can you imagine anything more ludicrious than Bush being a Constitutional scholar? He has tried to consolidate more and more power into the office of the president. This is not what our founding fathers envisioned. I think they call that a dictatorship. He holds the record for abusing his office, more than any other President. If I was a religious person I would say he is the anti-christ because he has done more to destroy the world than anyone I can imagine. Even Hitler's evil was limited.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

My Socialist? I don't want either one of them.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

So, at last you admit your guy is an evil! :)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Since there are only two choices, it's a little presumptious to think that anyone supports ALL the ideas of the man they plan to vote for. I mean, if Chavez has to choose does it mean he's falling into lockstep with Obama? My god man, let's think this through logically.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

So you think we should withdraw support from Obama because Chavez supports him? I suspect Chavez supports Obama because he thinks somehow that will irritate Bush. I really don't give a RATS ARSE who Chavez supports - doesn't affect me either way.

Did think it was funny when Chavez requested the extradition of Pat Robertson, though. I was for sending him down there to face trial. (lol)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Not true. Chavez doesn't really give a crap about anybody but himself. He just hates Bush. I suspect he's going to end up hating Obama, too. (lol)

Really? Just what is the "irrefutable" statement, Jonapril?

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

umm... he said, "Hitler was a socialist with the same platform for change as Obama. More recently Hugo Chavez's rise to power in Venezuela is similar to Hitler's and guess who he supports! Obama. If the planet is supposed to go through hell.. and it may be the plan... Obama is the being willing to take you there."

If you don't see anything irrefutable there, you really need to lay of the Kool-aid. 1. Hitler was not a socialist. 2. Chavez's rise to power is NOT similar to Hitler's. 3. What does Chavez's support of Obama have to do with Hitler? Nothing. Did Chavez say he supports Obama because he's like Hitler? No. Because he's like Chavez? No. 4. Obama has announced no plan to be willing to take us through hell. Damn... I guess it's ALL refutable.

Just looking at the bile you spew makes me a LITTLE bit more secure in my Obama vote. If you don't like him - hmmmm. Maybe that's one more reason to vote for him.

That's a cop-out, Silly!

Eh - I was going to vote for him anyway.

No, wait. I already did. By absentee ballot. Might end up being a poll watcher this election. Make sure we don't have any monkey business going on.

Kool-aid drinkers???? o.O

Why of course it does, suzanna. Just look at Obama. It's clear that he is in lock step with Rev. Wright and Bill Ayres, right? After all, he went to the church, he sat on the board of the non-profit. So what if nobody has been able to produce one quote where he even once said that he supports the radical positions or either man. His middle name is "Hussein" isn't it. Obviously the man can't be trusted. Oh, and did I mention he's black? </sarcasm>

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

Since you are saying both are left-wingers how can it matter to you which one wins?

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

YOUR press is in bed with Obama. MY press is in bed with McCain.