We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Ummm, ok if I have to spell it out for you.
The one with the most evil...Bush or Chaney.
Is it possible that you are the offspring of a Hauli-Waugs union? You seem to be just about on the same intellectual level. Somewhere between idiot 1 and idiot 2.
Tsk, tsk. You think because I asked a question about six men who are widely distrusted and hated through out the world that somehow I'm leaving out Clinton and Obama because of some perceived political bias. Unfortunately for you dear that is not the case. As far as your last comment, Hauli and Waugs are obviously far more intelligent and civil than you, as they are able to project their opinions without lowering themselves to personal insults. Your tactics only make you look weak in the face of an opponent better equipped to get their point across. You however my friend lack these essential qualities. I am glad you consider me on the same intellectual level. Thank you.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Well I'm glad to see an American who isn't afraid to show he is just as big a sissy as his Canadian brothers. Once again it was you who starts the name-calling and the questions that have no real answers and then calls ME childish. You liberals are so scared of facing facts that all you can do is attack me. Stick your ad-hominem up waugs cause he would enjoy it I'm sure.
Okay, point out to me where I called you a name or attacked you in any way that deserved your response in this question. Otherwise your crying wolf and using something that doesn't exist to continue your habitual hate. Yet again you demonstrate your lack of the essential qualities in debating with your ad-hominem attacks. Nice choice of words by the way, I often enjoy using it. Instead of defending yourself against my very real and less-than-threatening accusations, you return to name calling. Yet that isn't enough for you, you take it to the next level and attempt to play the martyr. Crucifying yourself won't do you any good when I have 493 of YOUR COMMENTS demonstrating your less than Christian behavior on this forum. With exception of perhaps five well-thought and valuable opinions, (that dealt with the death penalty and violence, go figure) the rest have been moderated down and one only has to click "show comment" to find the reason why. You don't know how to interact with people here without attacking them or their beliefs, political or religious. You gotta give a little to get a little and you WILL NOT be respected if you continue to treat people here like they are less than human and you, (lol) are somehow superior. By the way, I am no liberal sir. I am a Libertarian.
[1 point]2 years ago by dpravedReplyEdited 2 years ago by dpraved
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Very real???? "six men who are widely distrusted and hated around the world" seems to me like something a little hateful to me there queer boy. You choose to put MY president in a league with Stalin and Hitler and then wonder why you are being attacked. I'm not trying to defend myself by the way only trying to show how totally unbelievable you are to behave in this way. No you are NOT a libertarian in any way shape or form you are a BIG government LIBERAL just like OBAMA and Clinton. It is you and your butt buddies who can't understand that I AM a believer in the conservative point of view which has WON the last two presidential elections and will probably win the next one. You loud mouths have all the criticism but none of the answers just like Hillary and Osama(er Obama). Do I apologize for any of it? Not one damn bit. I do not need any respect from you or anyone that thinks like you. I have something you will never have and that is SELF respect. I go to sleep at night knowing that people like you are worrying themselves sick while I sleep like a beby.
Again, no answers, more name calling, more contradictions. Finally some admission of guilt, that's a step in the right direction. Dig yourself a deeper hole buddy. Keep going, you're almost there to the bottom.
[2 points]2 years ago by dpravedReplyEdited 2 years ago by dpraved
Not another one, surely? What I've seen from them hasn't been anything negative. I of course haven't taken the time to read over their comments in their profiles ... but they haven't been attacking me. Perhaps I shouldn't have put so much trust in them based on the comments I've seen.
[1 point]2 years ago by dpravedReplyEdited 2 years ago by dpraved
Don't worry about it. In a battle of wits, Crazyyank is unarmed. This is why his inane comments never appear on the site for more than 5 minutes before they are moderated down.
As an aside, this is the first time I think anyone has reached a -4. Another milestone that this nut can notch in his gun belt.
[3 points]2 years ago by HauliReplyEdited 2 years ago by Hauli
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
And that proves that there are at least 5 more libs on this site than there are real people. Big deal. Most of the libs on here are gay Canadians and they really don't count for much down here south of the border.
I doubt that you count for much south of the border either. By the way, are you the transvestite sitting on the motorbike getting ready for the Pride Parade?
[0 points]2 years ago by HauliReplyEdited 2 years ago by Hauli
I found this to be a difficult question. I am fairly certain I know what damage Clinton would do as most of her views and stances on issues have come out. Where as with Obama I still think he is a big unknown. If the question was Who do you think COULD cause the most damage..." I would go with Obama as I am not sure exactly what he plans to do, where as I think I know what Clinton plans to do.
If you want to attack someones ideas great, that is how we can learn from each other, gain insights to other points of view, and perhaps change our own opinions.
I almost never look at who has posted a comment, I only read the comment. If you need to know who posted the comment to reply, then perhaps you aren't really replying to the ideas in the comment.
[3 points]2 years ago by zandtReplyEdited 2 years ago by zandt
United States
McCain
Was just going to comment that the asker failed to give him as an option.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Yeah, I didn't see a Clinton or Osama(oops)Obama answer on your question either pinkie.
What question are you referring to? And did you really just call me pinkie? You're ridiculously childish. I hope to God you haven't reproduced.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Ummm, ok if I have to spell it out for you.
The one with the most evil...Bush or Chaney.
Is it possible that you are the offspring of a Hauli-Waugs union? You seem to be just about on the same intellectual level. Somewhere between idiot 1 and idiot 2.
Tsk, tsk. You think because I asked a question about six men who are widely distrusted and hated through out the world that somehow I'm leaving out Clinton and Obama because of some perceived political bias. Unfortunately for you dear that is not the case. As far as your last comment, Hauli and Waugs are obviously far more intelligent and civil than you, as they are able to project their opinions without lowering themselves to personal insults. Your tactics only make you look weak in the face of an opponent better equipped to get their point across. You however my friend lack these essential qualities. I am glad you consider me on the same intellectual level. Thank you.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Well I'm glad to see an American who isn't afraid to show he is just as big a sissy as his Canadian brothers. Once again it was you who starts the name-calling and the questions that have no real answers and then calls ME childish. You liberals are so scared of facing facts that all you can do is attack me. Stick your ad-hominem up waugs cause he would enjoy it I'm sure.
Okay, point out to me where I called you a name or attacked you in any way that deserved your response in this question. Otherwise your crying wolf and using something that doesn't exist to continue your habitual hate. Yet again you demonstrate your lack of the essential qualities in debating with your ad-hominem attacks. Nice choice of words by the way, I often enjoy using it. Instead of defending yourself against my very real and less-than-threatening accusations, you return to name calling. Yet that isn't enough for you, you take it to the next level and attempt to play the martyr. Crucifying yourself won't do you any good when I have 493 of YOUR COMMENTS demonstrating your less than Christian behavior on this forum. With exception of perhaps five well-thought and valuable opinions, (that dealt with the death penalty and violence, go figure) the rest have been moderated down and one only has to click "show comment" to find the reason why. You don't know how to interact with people here without attacking them or their beliefs, political or religious. You gotta give a little to get a little and you WILL NOT be respected if you continue to treat people here like they are less than human and you, (lol) are somehow superior. By the way, I am no liberal sir. I am a Libertarian.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Very real???? "six men who are widely distrusted and hated around the world" seems to me like something a little hateful to me there queer boy. You choose to put MY president in a league with Stalin and Hitler and then wonder why you are being attacked. I'm not trying to defend myself by the way only trying to show how totally unbelievable you are to behave in this way. No you are NOT a libertarian in any way shape or form you are a BIG government LIBERAL just like OBAMA and Clinton. It is you and your butt buddies who can't understand that I AM a believer in the conservative point of view which has WON the last two presidential elections and will probably win the next one. You loud mouths have all the criticism but none of the answers just like Hillary and Osama(er Obama). Do I apologize for any of it? Not one damn bit. I do not need any respect from you or anyone that thinks like you. I have something you will never have and that is SELF respect. I go to sleep at night knowing that people like you are worrying themselves sick while I sleep like a beby.
Again, no answers, more name calling, more contradictions. Finally some admission of guilt, that's a step in the right direction. Dig yourself a deeper hole buddy. Keep going, you're almost there to the bottom.
one of the greatest lessons in life is to learn from your defeats. bitch boy.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Peanut buttha? Wonder where ya got that name? LMAO
And you're calling me a bitch? LOL
Go get em peanut butt...I just can't stop laughing....
This comment was deleted.
[4 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyThis comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
I like to get responses from all of you because it just shows the world what a bunch of nuts the libs really are.
Waugs and Hauli, projecting their opinions without lowering themselves to personal insults?
Surely you jest. Please remove blinders or your cranium from your anal cavity, whichever is obstructing your vision.
Not another one, surely? What I've seen from them hasn't been anything negative. I of course haven't taken the time to read over their comments in their profiles ... but they haven't been attacking me. Perhaps I shouldn't have put so much trust in them based on the comments I've seen.
Don't worry about it. In a battle of wits, Crazyyank is unarmed. This is why his inane comments never appear on the site for more than 5 minutes before they are moderated down.
As an aside, this is the first time I think anyone has reached a -4. Another milestone that this nut can notch in his gun belt.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
And that proves that there are at least 5 more libs on this site than there are real people. Big deal. Most of the libs on here are gay Canadians and they really don't count for much down here south of the border.
I doubt that you count for much south of the border either. By the way, are you the transvestite sitting on the motorbike getting ready for the Pride Parade?
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyYou will have a backspace key on your keyboard.
Top right hand corner.
that's what i was going to say.
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyI'm assuming McCain would do no harm.
It's getting tougher for McCain as George Bush continues to pound the nails into the coffin.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Gettin tougher on the dems you mean. Latest polls show Clinton beating Osama(oops Obama) and McCain beating the bitch.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
You need an "either" choice. ;o)
I found this to be a difficult question. I am fairly certain I know what damage Clinton would do as most of her views and stances on issues have come out. Where as with Obama I still think he is a big unknown. If the question was Who do you think COULD cause the most damage..." I would go with Obama as I am not sure exactly what he plans to do, where as I think I know what Clinton plans to do.
Please stop the personal attacks.
If you want to attack someones ideas great, that is how we can learn from each other, gain insights to other points of view, and perhaps change our own opinions.
I almost never look at who has posted a comment, I only read the comment. If you need to know who posted the comment to reply, then perhaps you aren't really replying to the ideas in the comment.