When looking at the medal count for the Olympics, which do you think is better:
Submitted 105 days ago by mps1453 Favorite
Embed
Options
|
|
When looking at the medal count for the Olympics, which do you think is better:
(Please click one)
Cancel
|
|
- 6 Comments
Loading...
- 62 People Online
- 58 Votes
...and 0 Guests
|
|
| Male | Female |
|
|
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Already have an account? Login
| Results | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| More gold medals | |
|
|
|
| 30 votes 52% | |
| More medals overall | |
|
|
|
| 28 votes 48% | |



Looking at the smiles on all the winners that are fortunate enough to stand on the podium regardless of where they live.
Depends on how fixated you are on being the "best" instead of the 2nd or 3rd best. ;o)
Monex says there's never been a better time to invest in gold.
Anything other than first is a looser.
Give each country a gold medal for sending an athlete, then let the athletes compete (and party) in peace.
i thinkg it would be better to set points for medals! for example 3 points for gold and 2 points for silver and 1 point for Bronze!