We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Oh BTW lukewake, that $2.3 trillion, just so you can get your head around how much money that is:
The Iraq war has cost 470,000,000,000.oo so far so with that 2.3 trillion you could buy 5 wars like that or just imagine, if the tax payer is to repay this (who else would) then each and every person in America (including a new born) will have to pay back $8,000.oo
Now of course, the best way to deal with so much money lost would be to launch an investigation, fire a lot of people and figure out where the money went and get them to pay it back. But 'conveniently' nobody remembers this 2.3 missing trillion because it was reported only the day before 9/11 and everyone would soon get their minds on something more alarming.
6 years later, not a single penny has been recuperated, not a single investigation has been launched, not a single person has been fired!!
The USA will NEVER attack Canada and here is why: Since WWII the American military and the CIA have been involved in military action in over 60 countries - bombing cities, installing puppet governments, overthrowing elections and so on. Of all these countries, not one of them was a white country, with the exception of Serbia which was a UN initiative. Furthermore, of all these countries the USA has meddled with, not a single one of them was a Christian country, again with the exception of Serbia which was a UN initiative. Canada is predominantly white and predominantly Christian so the odds of the USA ever attacking is are extremely low and so my Christian white ass is pretty safe.
You are just too darn racist to attack a white Christian country. Before attacking a country, your gubment would have to convince you that it's a country filled with bad people and they are unable to convince you that neither white people nor Christians can be bad people. Propaganda is pretty powerful but it can't yet convince you of those things ..... time will tell.
Ohh and addionally, I agree with you on one point: it was pretty Rotten of the Clinton Administration to ignore the genocide in Rwanda and then rush into Bosnia...
But your ridiculous if you think America is a racist nation. There are small pockets of racists I am sure in every country (And as I recall, you used the N. word today)
You think using the N word (that's nigger BTW) makes a person a racist?
If you attack a single black or non-Christian country, that doesn't make you a racist, but when every single country you bomb, attack or subvert happens to be non-whites and non-Christians, I'd say that pretty much makes you a racist nation ...... but if you guys abstain from using the n word then that's all different .... you can't possibly be a racist if you don't say the n word .... right? .... Riiiigth!
Your (wrongly) assuming that we are (attacking) countries because of their ethnic/racial/religous backgrounds... thats just a wild and baseless proposition.
If the Mexicans had blown up the WTC (Ohhh and please dont go into your WTC conspiracy theory) we would be bombing Mexico City and not in Afganastan... our wars are about national security at the moment... race/religion/ethnicity have nothing to do with it
That's not what I said - in order to attak a country, your masters in Washington have to convince you that the country you are attacking is evil and full of bad people. It's easier to convince the population of America that the country is bad and that the people are evil if they are not white and if they are not Christians.
> If the Mexicans had blown up
> the WTC (Ohhh and please dont
> go into your WTC conspiracy
> theory) we would be bombing
> Mexico City
Well, strangely enough 15 of the 19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, none of them were from Afghanistan and none of them were from Iraq either. And since Iran is next, let me assure you that none of the 19 terrorists were from Iran either.
So why did the bushies ignore Saudi Arabia and invaded Afghanistan and Iraq?
BTW, the fact that 15 of the 19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia is not some wacky conspiracy theory, it's a well established fact.
My friend, please read Warrior Politics by Robert Kaplan.
It explains it well: we are not fighting a conventional war... this not about nations at all, we're fighting terrorists...
Look, if you had looney eco-terrorists from canada coming down and blowing up buildings, we would take care of that problem quickly.
It just so happens that the most organized dangerous and radical group of militants out there who are actually plotting to do harm to westerners (not just Americans) follow are extremist islamists... We dont hate them because they are islamists... we dont even hate them... we just want to create a safe and secure world... I think we have an interest in doing this much
Based on past performance I don't think so. You see, there was NO TERRORISTS from neither Afghanistan nor Iraq. 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia .... so explain to me how we ended up attacking Iraq and Afghanistan?
Do you remember the 2.3 Trillion (yes with a T) of tax payer's money which were claimed to be lost by the DoD?
They don't even try to explain how that much money can be just missing, they say it disappeared .... do you remember that?
Do you remember the $2,000,300,000,000.oo which simply disappeared?
But of course you don't remember that because as it turns out that 'missing' money was announced on Sept. 10th 2001 (the day before 9/11. So convenient that the money was announced just the day before 9/11 and the next day everyone would forget about this!
Perfect timing, isn't it? They report $2,300,000,000,000.oo missing and the next day everyone forgets about it!
And their excuse for it is astounding! They say: "Well we sign 10 million paychecks so that alone can be a problem" but in order to loose 2.3 trillion in the payroll they would have to overpay $230,000oo per check!!! LOL, that's so funny!
Keep in mind that this $2,300,000,000,000.oo was missing from one year alone.
Dude... the terrorists on the air planes died.... so we went after the ones who were still alive. The Saudis are cooperating with us so we dont need to deal with them. But Afganastan was a safe haven for the terrorists and they were in control there.... so I dont know anyone (except I suppose you) who could say it was a bas idea to go to Afganastan...
I never know ... you have some wild thoughts sometimes... conspiracy theories for everything... wouldnt surprise me if you thought the U.S. government was planning something like that too
Don't you remember? Bush told the Taliban to hand over Osama. The Taliban said "Sure, just give us some proof that he did it and we will hand him over". Bush refused, he said the proof is coming and we attacked without the proof ever coming.
> so I dont know anyone (except I
> suppose you) who could say it was a
> bas idea to go to Afganastan...
Oh it was a good idea alright .... just depends on how you ask. You see, an oil company called Unocal wanted to buiild a pipeline across Afghanistan in the 90's they spent millions and millions in geological surveys. There is oil and gas deep in the Caspian area, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get it.
When dealing with the Taliban for the pipeline, Unocal wanted a certain price, Unocal wanted more, so Unocal said "Get out" and they gave the contract to a South American company.
A Unocal employee when to Senate and said "There is trillions of profit to be made with that oil, but we can't do it, need a regime change in Afghanistan"
3 years later we attacked. Then we put a new head of state in Afghanistan, who just happens to be a former Unocal employee. Bush has a special envoy to Afghanistan, who also worked for Unocal. We are building 3 big beautiful bases in Afghanistan, directly along the proposed pipeline!
But of course, you are correct, we really did go into Afghanistan because of the Saudi Arabian terrorists .... duh!
And that $2.3 trillion which just disappeared the very day before 9/11 ...... that was just a coincidence, right? ..... right!
They stole $8,000.oo from you, they stole $8,000.oo from your wife and they stole an other $8,000.oo from each of your kids and you didn't even complain about it at all, you didn't even mind because the next day something more shocking would happen, something that would make you forget about that pesky $2,300,000,000,000.oo which just disappeared out of DoD without a trace or a reason .... nobody knows where it is, nobody cares where it is. Nobody is even investigating where it is. We are not talking about peanuts here, we are talking about enough money to finance 5 wars like the Iraq war, $8,000.oo per American, every man, woman and child!!
Don't you remember? Bush told the Taliban to hand over Osama. The Taliban said "Sure, just give us some proof that he did it and we will hand him over". Bush refused, he said the proof is coming and we attacked without the proof ever coming.
> so I dont know anyone (except I
> suppose you) who could say it was a
> bas idea to go to Afganastan...
Oh it was a good idea alright .... just depends on how you ask. You see, an oil company called Unocal wanted to buiild a pipeline across Afghanistan in the 90's they spent millions and millions in geological surveys. There is oil and gas deep in the Caspian area, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get it.
When dealing with the Taliban for the pipeline, Unocal wanted a certain price, Taliban wanted more, so Taliban said "Get out" and they gave the contract to a South American company.
A Unocal employee went to Senate and said "There is trillions of profit to be made with that oil, but we can't do it, need a regime change in Afghanistan"
3 years later we attacked. Then we put a new head of state in Afghanistan, who just happens to be a former Unocal employee. Bush has a special envoy to Afghanistan, who also worked for Unocal. We are building 3 big beautiful bases in Afghanistan, directly along the proposed pipeline!
But of course, you are correct, we really did go into Afghanistan because of the Saudi Arabian terrorists .... duh!
And that $2.3 trillion which just disappeared the very day before 9/11 ...... that was just a coincidence, right? ..... right!
They stole $8,000.oo from you, they stole $8,000.oo from your wife and they stole an other $8,000.oo from each of your kids and you didn't even complain about it at all, you didn't even mind because the next day something more shocking would happen, something that would make you forget about that pesky $2,300,000,000,000.oo which just disappeared out of DoD without a trace or a reason .... nobody knows where it is, nobody cares where it is. Nobody is even investigating where it is. We are not talking about peanuts here, we are talking about enough money to finance 5 wars like the Iraq war, $8,000.oo per American, every man, woman and child!!
Based on past performance I don't think so. You see, there was NO TERRORISTS from neither Afghanistan nor Iraq. 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia .... so explain to me how we ended up attacking Iraq and Afghanistan?
> It just so happens that the most
> organized dangerous and radical
> group of militants out there who are
> actually plotting to do harm to
> westerners (not just Americans)
> follow are extremist islamists...
Do you remember the 2.3 Trillion (yes with a T) of tax payer's money which were claimed to be lost by the DoD?
They don't even try to explain how that much money can be just missing, they say it disappeared .... do you remember that?
Do you remember the $2,000,300,000,000.oo which simply disappeared?
But of course you don't remember that because as it turns out that 'missing' money was announced on Sept. 10th 2001 (the day before 9/11. So convenient that the money was announced just the day before 9/11 and the next day everyone would forget about this!
Perfect timing, isn't it? They report $2,300,000,000,000.oo missing and the next day everyone forgets about it!
And their excuse for it is astounding! They say: "Well we sign 10 million paychecks so that alone can be a problem" but in order to loose 2.3 trillion in the payroll they would have to overpay $230,000oo per check!!! LOL, that's so funny!
Keep in mind that this $2,300,000,000,000.oo was missing from one year alone.
United States
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyWhat about weapons sales? Imperialism?
your next. Pussy
hahahaha LMAO
Oh BTW lukewake, that $2.3 trillion, just so you can get your head around how much money that is:
The Iraq war has cost 470,000,000,000.oo so far so with that 2.3 trillion you could buy 5 wars like that or just imagine, if the tax payer is to repay this (who else would) then each and every person in America (including a new born) will have to pay back $8,000.oo
Now of course, the best way to deal with so much money lost would be to launch an investigation, fire a lot of people and figure out where the money went and get them to pay it back. But 'conveniently' nobody remembers this 2.3 missing trillion because it was reported only the day before 9/11 and everyone would soon get their minds on something more alarming.
6 years later, not a single penny has been recuperated, not a single investigation has been launched, not a single person has been fired!!
The USA will NEVER attack Canada and here is why: Since WWII the American military and the CIA have been involved in military action in over 60 countries - bombing cities, installing puppet governments, overthrowing elections and so on. Of all these countries, not one of them was a white country, with the exception of Serbia which was a UN initiative. Furthermore, of all these countries the USA has meddled with, not a single one of them was a Christian country, again with the exception of Serbia which was a UN initiative. Canada is predominantly white and predominantly Christian so the odds of the USA ever attacking is are extremely low and so my Christian white ass is pretty safe.
You are just too darn racist to attack a white Christian country. Before attacking a country, your gubment would have to convince you that it's a country filled with bad people and they are unable to convince you that neither white people nor Christians can be bad people. Propaganda is pretty powerful but it can't yet convince you of those things ..... time will tell.
Haha he wasnt serious dude...
But we dont need to invade... we're already buying it (gotta love cross-border M&A action)
Also, we have had the longest undefended border ever since the end of the war of 1812.
But you know... Alberta does have oil.... hmmmm
Ohh and addionally, I agree with you on one point: it was pretty Rotten of the Clinton Administration to ignore the genocide in Rwanda and then rush into Bosnia...
But your ridiculous if you think America is a racist nation. There are small pockets of racists I am sure in every country (And as I recall, you used the N. word today)
You think using the N word (that's nigger BTW) makes a person a racist?
If you attack a single black or non-Christian country, that doesn't make you a racist, but when every single country you bomb, attack or subvert happens to be non-whites and non-Christians, I'd say that pretty much makes you a racist nation ...... but if you guys abstain from using the n word then that's all different .... you can't possibly be a racist if you don't say the n word .... right? .... Riiiigth!
Your (wrongly) assuming that we are (attacking) countries because of their ethnic/racial/religous backgrounds... thats just a wild and baseless proposition.
If the Mexicans had blown up the WTC (Ohhh and please dont go into your WTC conspiracy theory) we would be bombing Mexico City and not in Afganastan... our wars are about national security at the moment... race/religion/ethnicity have nothing to do with it
> Your (wrongly) assuming that
> we are (attacking) countries
> because of their
> ethnic/racial/religous
> backgrounds
That's not what I said - in order to attak a country, your masters in Washington have to convince you that the country you are attacking is evil and full of bad people. It's easier to convince the population of America that the country is bad and that the people are evil if they are not white and if they are not Christians.
> If the Mexicans had blown up
> the WTC (Ohhh and please dont
> go into your WTC conspiracy
> theory) we would be bombing
> Mexico City
Well, strangely enough 15 of the 19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, none of them were from Afghanistan and none of them were from Iraq either. And since Iran is next, let me assure you that none of the 19 terrorists were from Iran either.
So why did the bushies ignore Saudi Arabia and invaded Afghanistan and Iraq?
BTW, the fact that 15 of the 19 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia is not some wacky conspiracy theory, it's a well established fact.
My friend, please read Warrior Politics by Robert Kaplan.
It explains it well: we are not fighting a conventional war... this not about nations at all, we're fighting terrorists...
Look, if you had looney eco-terrorists from canada coming down and blowing up buildings, we would take care of that problem quickly.
It just so happens that the most organized dangerous and radical group of militants out there who are actually plotting to do harm to westerners (not just Americans) follow are extremist islamists... We dont hate them because they are islamists... we dont even hate them... we just want to create a safe and secure world... I think we have an interest in doing this much
See my reply here elsewhere on the thread, I was running out of room to reply here.
> Look, if you had looney
> eco-terrorists from canada coming
> down and blowing up buildings, we
> would take care of that problem
> quickly.
Based on past performance I don't think so. You see, there was NO TERRORISTS from neither Afghanistan nor Iraq. 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia .... so explain to me how we ended up attacking Iraq and Afghanistan?
Do you remember the 2.3 Trillion (yes with a T) of tax payer's money which were claimed to be lost by the DoD?
They don't even try to explain how that much money can be just missing, they say it disappeared .... do you remember that?
Do you remember the $2,000,300,000,000.oo which simply disappeared?
But of course you don't remember that because as it turns out that 'missing' money was announced on Sept. 10th 2001 (the day before 9/11. So convenient that the money was announced just the day before 9/11 and the next day everyone would forget about this!
Here is the link to the CBS report: http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5624554252926849071&q=%22september+10%2C+2001%22&total=49&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
Perfect timing, isn't it? They report $2,300,000,000,000.oo missing and the next day everyone forgets about it!
And their excuse for it is astounding! They say: "Well we sign 10 million paychecks so that alone can be a problem" but in order to loose 2.3 trillion in the payroll they would have to overpay $230,000oo per check!!! LOL, that's so funny!
Keep in mind that this $2,300,000,000,000.oo was missing from one year alone.
Dude... the terrorists on the air planes died.... so we went after the ones who were still alive. The Saudis are cooperating with us so we dont need to deal with them. But Afganastan was a safe haven for the terrorists and they were in control there.... so I dont know anyone (except I suppose you) who could say it was a bas idea to go to Afganastan...
> Haha he wasnt serious dude...
I know, I was just using the opportunity to make a point.
I never know ... you have some wild thoughts sometimes... conspiracy theories for everything... wouldnt surprise me if you thought the U.S. government was planning something like that too
I think we should invade Canada so we can send all the sex offenders there.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyohhh you conspiracy theorists....
Yes it was started with good intentions and bad intellegence...
> The Saudis are cooperating with us
> so we dont need to deal with them.
> But Afganastan was a safe haven for
> the terrorists and they were in
> control there....
Don't you remember? Bush told the Taliban to hand over Osama. The Taliban said "Sure, just give us some proof that he did it and we will hand him over". Bush refused, he said the proof is coming and we attacked without the proof ever coming.
> so I dont know anyone (except I
> suppose you) who could say it was a
> bas idea to go to Afganastan...
Oh it was a good idea alright .... just depends on how you ask. You see, an oil company called Unocal wanted to buiild a pipeline across Afghanistan in the 90's they spent millions and millions in geological surveys. There is oil and gas deep in the Caspian area, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get it.
When dealing with the Taliban for the pipeline, Unocal wanted a certain price, Unocal wanted more, so Unocal said "Get out" and they gave the contract to a South American company.
A Unocal employee when to Senate and said "There is trillions of profit to be made with that oil, but we can't do it, need a regime change in Afghanistan"
3 years later we attacked. Then we put a new head of state in Afghanistan, who just happens to be a former Unocal employee. Bush has a special envoy to Afghanistan, who also worked for Unocal. We are building 3 big beautiful bases in Afghanistan, directly along the proposed pipeline!
But of course, you are correct, we really did go into Afghanistan because of the Saudi Arabian terrorists .... duh!
And that $2.3 trillion which just disappeared the very day before 9/11 ...... that was just a coincidence, right? ..... right!
They stole $8,000.oo from you, they stole $8,000.oo from your wife and they stole an other $8,000.oo from each of your kids and you didn't even complain about it at all, you didn't even mind because the next day something more shocking would happen, something that would make you forget about that pesky $2,300,000,000,000.oo which just disappeared out of DoD without a trace or a reason .... nobody knows where it is, nobody cares where it is. Nobody is even investigating where it is. We are not talking about peanuts here, we are talking about enough money to finance 5 wars like the Iraq war, $8,000.oo per American, every man, woman and child!!
> The Saudis are cooperating with us
> so we dont need to deal with them.
> But Afganastan was a safe haven for
> the terrorists and they were in
> control there....
Don't you remember? Bush told the Taliban to hand over Osama. The Taliban said "Sure, just give us some proof that he did it and we will hand him over". Bush refused, he said the proof is coming and we attacked without the proof ever coming.
> so I dont know anyone (except I
> suppose you) who could say it was a
> bas idea to go to Afganastan...
Oh it was a good idea alright .... just depends on how you ask. You see, an oil company called Unocal wanted to buiild a pipeline across Afghanistan in the 90's they spent millions and millions in geological surveys. There is oil and gas deep in the Caspian area, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get it.
When dealing with the Taliban for the pipeline, Unocal wanted a certain price, Taliban wanted more, so Taliban said "Get out" and they gave the contract to a South American company.
A Unocal employee went to Senate and said "There is trillions of profit to be made with that oil, but we can't do it, need a regime change in Afghanistan"
3 years later we attacked. Then we put a new head of state in Afghanistan, who just happens to be a former Unocal employee. Bush has a special envoy to Afghanistan, who also worked for Unocal. We are building 3 big beautiful bases in Afghanistan, directly along the proposed pipeline!
But of course, you are correct, we really did go into Afghanistan because of the Saudi Arabian terrorists .... duh!
And that $2.3 trillion which just disappeared the very day before 9/11 ...... that was just a coincidence, right? ..... right!
They stole $8,000.oo from you, they stole $8,000.oo from your wife and they stole an other $8,000.oo from each of your kids and you didn't even complain about it at all, you didn't even mind because the next day something more shocking would happen, something that would make you forget about that pesky $2,300,000,000,000.oo which just disappeared out of DoD without a trace or a reason .... nobody knows where it is, nobody cares where it is. Nobody is even investigating where it is. We are not talking about peanuts here, we are talking about enough money to finance 5 wars like the Iraq war, $8,000.oo per American, every man, woman and child!!
> Look, if you had looney
> eco-terrorists from canada coming
> down and blowing up buildings, we
> would take care of that problem
> quickly.
Based on past performance I don't think so. You see, there was NO TERRORISTS from neither Afghanistan nor Iraq. 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia .... so explain to me how we ended up attacking Iraq and Afghanistan?
> It just so happens that the most
> organized dangerous and radical
> group of militants out there who are
> actually plotting to do harm to
> westerners (not just Americans)
> follow are extremist islamists...
Do you remember the 2.3 Trillion (yes with a T) of tax payer's money which were claimed to be lost by the DoD?
They don't even try to explain how that much money can be just missing, they say it disappeared .... do you remember that?
Do you remember the $2,000,300,000,000.oo which simply disappeared?
But of course you don't remember that because as it turns out that 'missing' money was announced on Sept. 10th 2001 (the day before 9/11. So convenient that the money was announced just the day before 9/11 and the next day everyone would forget about this!
Here is the link to the CBS report: http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5624554252926849071&q=%22september+10%2C+2001%22&total=49&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
Perfect timing, isn't it? They report $2,300,000,000,000.oo missing and the next day everyone forgets about it!
And their excuse for it is astounding! They say: "Well we sign 10 million paychecks so that alone can be a problem" but in order to loose 2.3 trillion in the payroll they would have to overpay $230,000oo per check!!! LOL, that's so funny!
Keep in mind that this $2,300,000,000,000.oo was missing from one year alone.