Should the USA prohibit the spouse of a former President from running for President?
Submitted 352 days ago by Anonymous
Favorite
Embed
Options
|
|
Loading...
|
|
We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Already have an account? Login
| Results | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 votes 22% | |
|
|
|
| 80 votes 78% | |
no
The question sounds as though it were posed by a disgruntled Republican who's Clinton hate is so strong they sound like fools everytime the Clintons are the topic of a discussion ... as for me ...
In the United States, any citizen can dream of aspiring to the office of President of the United States. Who is to deny over 200 years of an enlightened government. We threw out the "scoundrels" that believed that an accident of birth gave them the right to rule over their neighbors.
You give me goose bumps.
Only if it bans the kids of a former President from running, too.
Hah, nice...
Or anyone who has a name that rhymes with Bush!!
Absolutely not.
No. Isn't it fascinating how these Bush haters introduce their spurious crap into almost every question?
Now, isn't it rather obvious that the ASKER of the question was introducing their spurious hatred of Hillary? I just gave the natural knee-jerk response.
Lol ... nicely put ...
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 351 days ago by deleted user ReplyAs is your wont. I actually detected a tongue-in-cheek to the question.
Only if they're under 45 and/or are not a naturalized US citizen.
If the spouse has a long resume of working in government positions, then NO ... If the only bullet point in their resume is "HUSBAND/WIFE of the president of the US," then YES ...
Sure this is internal affair of the Americans. As for me, I'd not going to advice with anything like so,
however to my informal opinion family ruling looks very much like hereditary. George II got legacy from George I. Hilary I will get too. I don't criticize the idea, monarchical rule existed for many years and is not bad. Why not
P.S. I have no answer on this question
There was lots of inbreeding in older monarchies too.
Again, monarchs are the same humans as we are, that's why it is his/her sole decision whom to f*** and whom to marry. They married their relatives, why no? It is not worse than homosexuality.
Can we have more global related questions. I personally don't care about what the US does.
Nicely put!
Be nice if more of your brethren felt that way tedrock.