| Should Congressmen be forced to wear patches from their corporate sponsors on them, size of patch=size of donation? |
|
|
|
Asked 4 years ago
by JohnUSeed  United States |
|
About
A person trying to sow the seeds of utopia throughout the world...
|
8 Points
|
It might seem silly, but it'd definitely let us know from whom the Congresscritters get their re-election funds.
I would like to see that..
There finances are public record for anyone wanting to look it up. The fact that someone gave them money isn't the problem. If I was running I'd take money from any legal source. The problem is if they don't do/support what they claim they will during elections.
Let's carry it further, have all liberals, conservatives, communists, jews, Christians, agnostics, athiests, pro-abortionists and pro-life people wear patches.
Liberals, conservatives, communists, Jews, christians, agnostics, atheists, pro-abortionists and pro-life people don't usually feed from the public troth. Congresscritters are supposed to work for the common man, not corporate interests. We are (supposedly) their bosses, so why can't we give them a dress code?
are you kidding? they would be hidden by the patches. oh wait - if that were the case our present embarrassment of a president might not have been elected if that were the case. so YES!
After 7 years they'd still be looking for him.
Oh, I'm sorry, their already trying to find him without the patches.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyhilarious.
Has Congress ever listened to the people? They don't work for us. Good luck trying to get them to wear a patch.