| Quotation by Richard Dawkins:"We admit that we are like apes, but we seldom realise that we are apes." Do you agree? |
|
|
|
Asked 3 years ago
by Zeega  Slovenia |
|
About
Law student, interested in philosophy, sport, politics, religion, education...
|
8 Points
|
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Maybe Richard Dawkins is an ape, but my species didn't evolve, we were created by God.
Yeah, I always thought that cats were really arrogant. Thinking themselves special and different from all other life forms.
100% with you! I know I didn't evolve! Our human bodies are too complex to have 'evolved'.
.. too complex? What parts does the human body got that animals doesn't? :>
It's really a measure of the lack of complexity of imagination in some people.
Animals are too complex as well.
I take it dinosaurs were too complex as well
Any outside observer would agree. Only people who have a need to feel special think otherwise.
But evolution is scientifically proven. How can you say God created us, if there is no proof?!
Because,Zeega, these people have 'faith' which enables them to believe any impossibility they choose. Pretty handy sort of talent.
Funny that what you are saying is inversely convenient for your own theories.
Evolution is not proven, yet to this day it still is a theory. Evolutionists base all proof on linear decay rates which has been proven to be flawed, yet considered correct anyway. Some evolution is true some is assumed correct through speculation. Where evolution loses sight is when it tries to guess about millions or billions of years that it wasn't even here to judge.
I believe in creation mostly because I am logical. Because I understand things do not accidentally create themselves. Take a string of random numbers (which I have studied for many years) let them be motivated to produce a random sting of characters which I have done. Now use this string to randomly produce with white noise even just one word randomly. Not even to mention the complexity of a book or the string of complexity that encompasses the code (program) in the human DNA. You see our arms and legs are a system of levers and our eyes a focusing mechanism. Yet even though we have no proof it points to it through logical reasoning. I am sure I will be bombarded with retaliation for what I am saying here but I would not mind being a creature who evolved or one that was created. Just as though it may seem presumptuous to believe in a God who created all, it is just as presumptuous to believe in something that created itself out nothing.
Nothing and nothing cannot create 'something'. Really, evolution is a belief and requires faith for it to be true and correct. Like Torque said, evolution is speculated and assumed. No one, other than God who created the world, was witness to its creation. If evolution 'is correct' why aren't there 'evolving' animals and plants and humans?
Nothing cannot create something?? Than, who created God, and who created the creator of God? We do not know anything. What we know is that it is more likely that we evolved from other beings than that God created us, and it is proven that species can evolve and they are evolving. This is logical and not the creationism... How can you say that someone or something (God in this case) created us, if you do not even know who he is, where he is, how he did this, is he a living being, where he comes from and so on... Please, someone answer me... Because I know that no one can.