obama was a good choice for the nobel peace prize?
Click to vote
27%37 Votes
Strongly Disagree
18%25 Votes
Disagree
15%21 Votes
Undecided
26%35 Votes
Agree
14%19 Votes
Strongly Agree
27%37 Votes
Strongly Disagree
18%25 Votes
Disagree
15%21 Votes
Undecided
26%35 Votes
Agree
14%19 Votes
Strongly Agree
Male
Female
25%18 Votes
Strongly Disagree
24%17 Votes
Disagree
14%10 Votes
Undecided
25%18 Votes
Agree
11%8 Votes
Strongly Agree
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
That is one question I would also have but also I have to say I find it premature to award the Nobel peace prize to him at this point. In that respect I do not find him a very good choice.
"There is nothing wrong with you doing what the last guy failed to do -- capture the man or men responsible for the mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. BUT YOU CANNOT DO THAT WITH TANKS AND TROOPS. You are pursuing a criminal, not an army. You do not use a stick of dynamite to get rid of a mouse." ~MM
[1 point]42 days ago by ChipmonkReplyEdited 42 days ago by Chipmonk
He was a horrible choice for such a conceived prestigious award. But you are right, there are not many good choices out there, because of things like "political correctness" great men can not say and do things that show greatness.
Though political choices have arguably been made before. Obama is the most obviously political choice I have ever seen. Since he was nominated 12 days after he took office, he had not done anything yet.
The Nobel judges have lost a ton of credibility on this one. (Even if you agree with Obama's foreign policies)
United States
I don't know: who else was nominated?
That is one question I would also have but also I have to say I find it premature to award the Nobel peace prize to him at this point. In that respect I do not find him a very good choice.
Absolutely. Let's look at the matter 10 years from now.
If the nomination helps persuade him to leave the middle east, it was a great choice.
If it doesn't, it was a bad choice.
Since he won it this year I hope we find out this year. If he has no intention of leaving the middle east this year he should give it back.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mikes-letter/congratulations-president-obama-nobel-peace-prize-now-please-earn-it
"There is nothing wrong with you doing what the last guy failed to do -- capture the man or men responsible for the mass murder of 3,000 people on 9/11. BUT YOU CANNOT DO THAT WITH TANKS AND TROOPS. You are pursuing a criminal, not an army. You do not use a stick of dynamite to get rid of a mouse." ~MM
I haven't heard anyone make a better suggestion yet.
He was a horrible choice for such a conceived prestigious award. But you are right, there are not many good choices out there, because of things like "political correctness" great men can not say and do things that show greatness.
Because of who does the choosing the PP is a farce and it does not matter a damn who wins it.
At least in your (not so humble) opinion. ;o)
I do not intend to get into a "humbler than thou" contest with you Plawler.
Though political choices have arguably been made before. Obama is the most obviously political choice I have ever seen. Since he was nominated 12 days after he took office, he had not done anything yet.
The Nobel judges have lost a ton of credibility on this one. (Even if you agree with Obama's foreign policies)