Is it likely or unlikely that "birthers" are bigots who can't stand the idea of President Barack Obama in the White House?
Click to vote
14%8 Votes
Very Unlikely
9%5 Votes
Unlikely
9%5 Votes
Not Sure
18%10 Votes
Likely
51%29 Votes
Very Likely
14%8 Votes
Very Unlikely
9%5 Votes
Unlikely
9%5 Votes
Not Sure
18%10 Votes
Likely
51%29 Votes
Very Likely
Male
Female
7%2 Votes
Very Unlikely
7%2 Votes
Unlikely
7%2 Votes
Not Sure
26%7 Votes
Likely
52%14 Votes
Very Likely
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
The nut-jobs who are trying to prove Obama is not a native-born citizen, while ignoring the fact that McCain, born in the Canal ZOne, was made natural-born by an ex post facto law--something prohibited by the Constitution.
They need to ask themselves something: Would Joe Biden really be any better?
At this point, he gets in, not McCain.
They are not interested in that, they are just against a non white person being commander in chief.
It's been a long time since I've seen a question that has screamed for "Very Likely"!
Duh.
Somewhere I missed the explanation of "birthers". Can someone provide a definition.
A video is worth a million words:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/03/orly-taitz-melts-down-on_n_250441.html
The nut-jobs who are trying to prove Obama is not a native-born citizen, while ignoring the fact that McCain, born in the Canal ZOne, was made natural-born by an ex post facto law--something prohibited by the Constitution.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 3 years ago by deleted user Reply