If McCain loses, at sometime in the future, would you support Palin for President of the United States?
Submitted 57 days ago by ChipmonkFavoriteEmbedOptions
If McCain loses, at sometime in the future, would you support Palin for President of the United States?(Please click yes or no)
I lived in Wasilla AK for a number of years and know Sarah personally and I could "SEE" back then and I know just what she looks like. And as much as I am from Arizona and Know John I have sent him a personal letter asking him to step and and Let Sarah run it.
Half of the registered voters surveyed by CNN were asked if Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, was qualified to be president: 57 percent said she wasn't and 43 percent said she was. Among the half of registered voters who were asked if Senator Joe Biden of Delaware is qualified, 80 percent said yes and 18 percent said no.
The only folks who say polls don't mean much are the people who are behind in the polls.
Of course, they mean exactly what they say. They are a barometer of current opinion. To say that doesn't mean much in the days before an election is rather absurd, don't you think? It's useful to know if what you are doing is working, or not working, as the case may be, so you can continue doing what you're doing, or make changes to increase your chances of winning.
Just like the only people who say "I like being the underdog" are people who don't want to look like they are shitting themselves because they are tanking in the aforementioned polls.
[2 points]56 days ago by waugsReplyEdited 56 days ago by waugs
The problem with them is getting realistic unbiased numbers. What questions lead up to the one quoted? Why where only half of the sample asked the question? What was the exact verbiage of the question? Who was the sample? etc. Not saying they are worthless. Just saying that unless you know all the background info related to a poll you don't know what results you are really getting.
She will fade into the woodwork after November, go back to Alaska where she'll likely face impeachment. She'll probably run for Ted Stevens' old Senate seat once they lock him up. And once again she will lose to a Democrat.
[4 points]56 days ago by waugsReplyEdited 56 days ago by waugs
Actually I was kidding about the Senate seat. Looks like Ted might lose his reelection bid to a Dem this year, so he won't vacate the seat when they throw him in the slammer. She could always go back to being mayor.
CNN: Obama 50%, McCain 47%. ABC/WaPo: Obama 51%, McCain 45%. Rasmussen: McCain 48%, Obama 47%. Columbus Dispatch: Obama 49%, McCain 42% (woo!). GQR: Obama 49%, McCain 43%. Quinnipiac: Obama 50%, McCain 42% (woo woo!). Even Mean Jean is in trouble!
This is why it was so important to get the OH vote out as soon as possible, to lock in this lead. Nationally the spread continues, and McCain is in a virtual poll freefall now.
[2 points]56 days ago by waugsReplyEdited 56 days ago by waugs
Her views are unrealistic--as are many of the Republicans it seems. I'm a moderate, and in four years where Congress would be mostly comprised of Democrats if McCain McCain/Palin were to be elected, half of the shit they contrive wouldn't be passed.
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Loading...
I would vote for her NOW and Ask John McCain to step down
Well then, that screen name fits to a T.
lol
Sounds like he can hear pretty darn good. I feel sorry for him though as he cannot see the prettiest VP nominee that has ever been.
I lived in Wasilla AK for a number of years and know Sarah personally and I could "SEE" back then and I know just what she looks like. And as much as I am from Arizona and Know John I have sent him a personal letter asking him to step and and Let Sarah run it.
LOL! Good for you! That is great!
Yeah, because being pretty is such a fine qualification.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
What? Many women voted for Bill Clinton because he was "pretty."
Stupid bastard, april.
You forgot Geraldine Ferraro
Half of the registered voters surveyed by CNN were asked if Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, was qualified to be president: 57 percent said she wasn't and 43 percent said she was. Among the half of registered voters who were asked if Senator Joe Biden of Delaware is qualified, 80 percent said yes and 18 percent said no.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
CNN? OK! We'll take that poll to the bank... LOL
Polls don't mean much. If they did we'd probably have clueless celebrities running government ... Wait a minute...
The only folks who say polls don't mean much are the people who are behind in the polls.
Of course, they mean exactly what they say. They are a barometer of current opinion. To say that doesn't mean much in the days before an election is rather absurd, don't you think? It's useful to know if what you are doing is working, or not working, as the case may be, so you can continue doing what you're doing, or make changes to increase your chances of winning.
Just like the only people who say "I like being the underdog" are people who don't want to look like they are shitting themselves because they are tanking in the aforementioned polls.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Eloquently verbalized!
U R still pathetic!
Nope, I say that when I'm ahead too.
The problem with them is getting realistic unbiased numbers. What questions lead up to the one quoted? Why where only half of the sample asked the question? What was the exact verbiage of the question? Who was the sample? etc. Not saying they are worthless. Just saying that unless you know all the background info related to a poll you don't know what results you are really getting.
Those are all answerable questions for any legitimate polling service.
lol!
She will fade into the woodwork after November, go back to Alaska where she'll likely face impeachment. She'll probably run for Ted Stevens' old Senate seat once they lock him up. And once again she will lose to a Democrat.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Impeachment? OMG! You are getting more pathetic every day! ROFL!
From your fingers to God's eyes.
Actually I was kidding about the Senate seat. Looks like Ted might lose his reelection bid to a Dem this year, so he won't vacate the seat when they throw him in the slammer. She could always go back to being mayor.
Have you seen the Ohio polls today?
http://www.pollster.com/polls/oh/08-oh-pres-ge-mvo.php
CNN: Obama 50%, McCain 47%. ABC/WaPo: Obama 51%, McCain 45%. Rasmussen: McCain 48%, Obama 47%. Columbus Dispatch: Obama 49%, McCain 42% (woo!). GQR: Obama 49%, McCain 43%. Quinnipiac: Obama 50%, McCain 42% (woo woo!). Even Mean Jean is in trouble!
This is why it was so important to get the OH vote out as soon as possible, to lock in this lead. Nationally the spread continues, and McCain is in a virtual poll freefall now.
Here's some fun, if you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dha4tCnji5k
Her views are unrealistic--as are many of the Republicans it seems. I'm a moderate, and in four years where Congress would be mostly comprised of Democrats if McCain McCain/Palin were to be elected, half of the shit they contrive wouldn't be passed.