Ask500

| Login

If all of them ran for president, who would you vote for? Ask a Question

If all of them ran for president, who would you vote for?
Click to vote
Hillary Clinton
Barack Obama
John Mc Cain
George W. Bush
6 Answers

Can't vote for Bush, he has run twice and so would be violating the constitution.

Can't vote for Barack, don't want to be led off mindless by his sweet song that says nothing of substance and don't know where I'm going or how I'm getting there.

Guess I'm left with Hillary or John. Hmmm, I'm going to need some more beer here.

14 Replies to dr1024's answer

I am assuming the questioner knew that President Bush couldn't run again as it now stands, but has amended to the constitution to allow it, in which case I would re-elect President Bush.

No, you would vote for Bush. He would lose in the largest landslide in American history.

Really!? Not that Bush would win or loose, but that he would lose in the largest landslide in American history? George Washington set the bar rather high with a landslide of 100% of the Electoral vote. (Even if we want to switch to popular vote, he would have to get less than 38% in a head to head race (no third party tickets) to set a new record.)

You're right. Bush would get two votes. Yours and Mike's.

And none of them will get yours.

agree s/ Hauli

I said re-elect bub and that's what I meant.

What you said was: "...I would re-elect President Bush." You'd do that all by yourself????

Picky, picky, picky..of course it should have read "I would vote to re-elect..."

Well, I'm just using your own words. When Hauli said that you would "vote for Bush," your response was: "I said re-elect bub [sic] and that's what I meant." Now you're saying something different. So Hauli was right when he said: "No, you would vote for Bush." You need to choose your words more wisely. Either you meant it, or you didn't mean it.

And you need to get a life. Surely you must have something better to do than parsing peoples posts.

Oh, I should get a "life" like yours? No, thanks. I couldn't stand myself if I were so ignorant. By the way, the purpose of this site is to "parse" the messages: parse - To make sense of; comprehend: I simply couldn't parse what you just said. (See http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/parse;_ylt=AnaNHp7Md4P5ioIarCk1cDSsgMMF)

I find that people who call other people ignorant, suffer from that same malady.

Well, I will admit that there are SOME things regarding which I am ignorant. I am ignorant about quantum physics, about the make-up of the universe, and many other things. Look up the definition here: http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/ignorant

On the other hand, I don't advertise my ignorance (as you) by posting to public boards any remarks regarding subjects of which I am ignorant.

Following your analogy, I refer to this quotation of yours, addressed to shd191 (on this same page) and say, I find that people who tell other people they are "full of crap" suffer from that same malady:

"shd191, you comments are so wrong and so insulting it would take a novellete [sic] to respond property [sic]. Suffice to say you are full of crap."

What, no undecideds? No independents? No choice? Oh, I forgot, that's already been taken away...

if bush were allowed to run again i would make a nice exit out of this country and head for our lovely neighbor canada.

2 Replies to jlwallen's answer

And the U.S.A. would be a better place.

Hey, don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out.

LOL! im with jlwallen

1 Replies to barackvoter327's answer

Please do join him in Canada.

I couldn't stand seeing Hilary's face on TV for 4 years. Let alone her voice is annoying as hell. She failed on health care while Bill was in office. She had her chance to show her true flags. Plus, I'm tired of seeing double turns at office for the same families. Bush/Clinton. It's time to move on.

I'd also rather have a black man as president before a white woman. I'm not against females running. I just don't feel like this country is ready for a female leader.

Mccain is just plain F**king retarded. Read the majority of the shlt he says - nothing is thought out. He also comes from a rich background. He's not capable of running this country the way it needs to be ran - helping the lower class pick-up the slack. Opportunities for all our children.

Bush only took office his second run because of the war. That's it. He's clueless.

Please reply with your thoughts/responses. No hard feelings for anything replied to me. Thanks.

shd191

4 Replies to shd191's answer

shd191, you comments are so wrong and so insulting it would take a novellete to respond property. Suffice to say you are full of crap.

"...[I]t would take a novellete to respond property"????? Can you put this into English?

Gee, I bet you really knew it should have read "properly", but just wanted to show what a smart-ass you are. Right?

Well, no...

Actually, my purpose was to reveal the ignorance of one who claims "...that's what I meant." It wasn't just "property" but also "novellete"! What is THAT?

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/search;_ylt=AkcdRClTIRZc9ICCWxaTXiCqgMMF?p=novellete

Bush isn't so bad. It's the Neo-Naz. . .

Neo-Commu. . .

Neo-Cons he's got protecting him from reality.

1 Replies to lummer's answer

And you have been snorting again.