| Hillary, 4th in line for succession. Should the V.P., Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate be worried |
|
Hillary, 4th in line for succession. Should the V.P., Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate be worried
Click to vote
United States
There were a lot more than 33 unsolved murders that occurred in the US during the 8 years of the Clinton Presidency....so I am a little confused about these 33 murders and reign --- please explain yourself
Go ahead, tell him the part about not posting biased questions!
I agree here. foxbaron, are you suggesting that Bill and Hillary were personally responsible for murdering thirty three people?
Perhaps not personally murdering... but there *was* an awful lot of convenient suicides in those 8 years.
The premise of your answer is flawed. The Clintons did not have a "reign."
If she were that way inclined, don't you think Clinton would have had a 'stroke', and she would have emulated Edith Wilson?
Get real.
Does no one have a sense of humor?
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 224 days ago by deleted user ReplyI didn't know I was a right-wing fucktard with freeper neocon bullshit.
I sorta understand the right-wing fucktard part but what is a freeper neocon?
Freeper, I believe, is short for "free republic".
What the hell is Free Republic?
This comment was deleted.
[-1 points] 224 days ago by deleted user ReplyThank you, thank you for your support. Kinda sounds like an ice crean commercial doesn't it?
But thanks, really, no shit.
From their website:
"Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web.."
If you substitute "every hating nutcase with an ax to grind and a desire to see others miserable" it will be just as accurate.
This comment was deleted.
[-1 points] 224 days ago by deleted user ReplyWho the hell is they? "When the stuff you say is the same stuff they say". Whoever "they is" please, consider me one of them, but only if it pisses you off.
And what the hell is "right-wing fuctard freeper* neocon liberal democrat bashing".
A general rule, according to who? Who sets the rules?
And furthermore the definition you quote, " A pseudo-conservative known corectly as a neo-con who likes to pretend they are conservative, but are actually a bunch of pro-corporate whores who worship the grandson of the nazi facillitator Prescott Bush"
Where did you get this definition? Is the Urban Dictionary some sort of authority? I never heard of it before and it is a pretty dumb ass definition.
Plus, I have never heard of freerepublic.com. who the hell are they?
Is it possible that you folks can make some sort of sense and post a reply that would result in others, not only me, making an intelligent repsonse to your post. Do you have anything of substance to say or not?
The original question was kind of tongue in cheek but you guys have a way of elevating things to a level of stupidity .
The problem is, there are too many 'conservatives' (read 'nutcases') who have made it impossible to read something like this question as humor. Unless it is the kind of humor that guffaws at 'Liza and Rastus jokes.
It is exactly the kind of stuff the freeper crowd were posting all summer until the election, so there is no way to tell it was meant as humor THIS time. Especially from someone known as foxbaron, and given the insanity that FOX news usually presents as 'fact', people might be inclined to think you part of the nutcase, hating crowd.
I have taken a cursory look at your website, and while I do not agree with some of what you say, you seem to be able to state your case cogently and logically without frothing at the mouth, insulting everyone who does not agree with you, and generally coming across as an idiot. It is too bad that others have so sullied the waters it is making it hard for you, but, to quote one of them, that's life.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 223 days ago by deleted user ReplyIt looks like your absence has not mellowed you at all ... your foul mouth demonstrates your ignorance, arrogance, and trying to intimidate (in Canada it could be considered assault) once again .....
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 223 days ago by deleted user ReplyWhat, what I said wasn't funny?
How about if everbody goes to my webiste/blog
foxbaron,blogspot.com and then come back and tell me if they agree with dauguy.
it'snice to know I don't froth at the mouth.