| Have you ever heard anyone use that "marry my dog" argument to justify why same-sex marriage is wrong? |
|
|
|
Asked 3 years ago
by cooljuno411  United States |
| 4 Points |
http://www.neatorama.com/2007/11/14/man-married-dog-to-void-curse/
I do not support man and dog marriage's.
I was watching "A Double Shot at Love" on MTV, just like "A Shot at Love" but with bisexual twins... and not bisexual Tila Tequila. And they were talking to this guy about his "conservative political views"... and they asked him about same-sex marriage and he pulled out the "marry my dog" argument, them most cliché argument used by the pro-hate movement. And then he went on to say being gay is "scientifically" bad.... yada yada yada yada,ignorance... And it's not ironic that he is the ass whole of the house.
And what makes me lol is his whole "scientific" argument.... lolz.... remind my of the person on YouTube who says being gay is bad for us, and "our bodies are not designed for that"..... would be a great argument if we were like a car or computer, and actually were designed... well according to recognized science, aka evolution, we weren't designed....
update: his ass got eliminated.... ha, lolz.... and they said it was because he said that....
I think gay people play an important scientific role in the cycle of life on this planet,as far as over-population goes.I think its mans way of evolving to a rising population crises on this earth.I'd have to disagree with you about the idea of us not being designed because of evolution.I think its more plausible to say we are designed to evolve.
intelligent design??? And btw, saying "we were designed to evolve" implies we were the "end product".... aka the christian version of creationism.... i assume you mean life was designed to evolve, and you are implying we are the result of a, in a way to put it, "a seed of life"....
Why do we have to be the end result? Maybe we're still being "created". It doesn't hurt to ponder the possibilities.
I agree that gay people, right now, may be helping curb over-population. But I don't think that we've evolved for that purpose.
I was not saying we are the end result of evolution.... i am saying that by implying humans are designed means that we were specifically designed, an end product of someones design, just lie christian creationism.....
And if the "foundations of life" were designed, but not specifically humans... then we were not designed. Evolution shows that we have common ancestors, possibly starting from the same "foundation of life". If this is true, then that means humans were not specifically designed, that means the "foundations of life" were designed, and we are result of allowing the foundations of life evolve.
Well like calebF said who says we're the end result.and saying we were designed to evolve doesn't imply we are the end result.
And just like calebF, you miss understood what i was saying....
well i should have proofread. replace were with are.
I have only seen intellectuals on Jerry Springer use this argument.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 3 years ago by deleted user ReplyNo, they try and justify why same sex marriage is wrong by comparing it to marrying a dog. I have heard it handfulls of times, the one guy from Guam who uses this site has even posted the dog arguement
Image this guy with a gay son?