Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
an increase in the greenhouse effect caused by higher concentration of greenhouse gases(such as C02 but others as well) in the atmosphere.
A possible solutions to this problem could be the systematic elimination of these excess greenhouse gases or the release of greenhouse inhibitors in the atmosphere to counter the effect. I personally agree with the first option.
But endless debate over who caused the problem is not a productive step in solving the problem. Global warming has to be addressed, no matter WHAT its causes.
United States
You sort of need more options here. The correct answer is, of course, both.
I agree. Some of it is natural but we do pollute a heck of a lot and that is not good for the atmosphere.
This comment was deleted.
[0 points] 1 year ago by deleted user ReplyI definitely think people need to work on reducing pollution, but this poll is about Global Warming.
A little bit of both.
an increase in the greenhouse effect caused by higher concentration of greenhouse gases(such as C02 but others as well) in the atmosphere.
A possible solutions to this problem could be the systematic elimination of these excess greenhouse gases or the release of greenhouse inhibitors in the atmosphere to counter the effect. I personally agree with the first option.
oh and btw it's not important who caused the problem, what is important is that we solve it.
But knowing who caused the problem is the first step in knowing how to solve the problem.
But endless debate over who caused the problem is not a productive step in solving the problem. Global warming has to be addressed, no matter WHAT its causes.
This comment was deleted.
[0 points] 1 year ago by deleted user ReplyThis comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
1st reference is article by an electrical engineer. Hardly an expert in climate science.
2nd reference is an obvious smear site <globalwarminglies.com> which you (not very cleverly) tried to disguise with a tinyurl link.
Now how about pointing us to some REAL climate scientists who substantially disagree with Al Gore.