Ask500

| Login

George Bush’s administration had more "czars" (Czar" is media lingo, not an official title) than the Obama administration. Ask a Question

George Bush’s administration had more "czars" (Czar" is media lingo, not an official title) than the Obama administration.
Click to vote
True
False
3 Answers

This comment was deleted.

6 Replies to deleted user's answer

In the US, Cabinet members that have the ability to make and enforce regulations are vetted and confirmed by the US Senate. This is one of checks in our constitution to keep the President from becoming an Emperor.

The presidents before Obama have appointed short term experts to work on a specific issue. Conservatives believe Obama has used this practice to form a Cabinet without actually calling it a Cabinet. Among other advantages, they don't have to be vetted and he doesn't have to deal with that pesky congress.

This comment was deleted.

Two things. Your personal insults are irritating, They don't really hurt me and they don't help your cause.

Second, Obama's Czars have administrative power. They can make regulations and see that they are followed. They are advisers too, of course. I have no problem with Obama using whoever he wants to as an adviser. It's the other responsibilities I have a problem with.

This comment was deleted.

This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)

This comment was deleted.

Actually, this question is unanswerable. George Bush had more czars in eight years than Obama has appointed so far... but Obama's administration is not over yet.

Does Obama have 78 now or 87? I can't keep up.

1 Replies to JWBrothers's answer

okay. obama has at least 36 of them. many of them are given cabinet leadership positions. and the thing with the czars is that they dont have to be approved by the senate. thus Obama can pick whoever he wants. why doesnt Obama do his job and not give it to uncompetent "czars". Obama definitely already has more czars than Bush did. no doubt.