- Sorry, we couldn't find that question.
| Does one of these people represent your general voice of reason? |
|
Does one of these people represent your general voice of reason?
Click to vote
|
|
||||
|
|
| Does one of these people represent your general voice of reason? |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
I'm sorry Mabie, but Rush Limbaugh? There is NO evidence that he has EVER used reason for anything.
Same for Michael Moore. What a slobbering fraud.
Show me one pic where he is slobbering.
And that 'fraud' got 9/11 heroes medical care when this country wouldn't.
Moore a fraud? Don't you think he believes what he says? He may be chubby and outspoken, but he has an impressive grasp of his subjects and his films seem very well reasoned, to me. He's sort of an anti-Rush.
Being sort of an anti-Rush was my original point.
Michael Moore's film rants are the worst kind of pseudo-science and pseudo-reporting. Everything he does is based on easily disprovable allegations. They are done in a style suitable for a serious science reporter, but there is nothing serious or scientific there.