Community: Do you think Ask500 should have multiple votes running concurrently to make things more exciting?
Click to vote
24%6 Votes
Strongly Disagree
8%2 Votes
Disagree
16%4 Votes
Undecided
24%6 Votes
Agree
28%7 Votes
Strongly Agree
24%6 Votes
Strongly Disagree
8%2 Votes
Disagree
16%4 Votes
Undecided
24%6 Votes
Agree
28%7 Votes
Strongly Agree
This graph isn't ready yet
We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
True. That could become a problem, especially if several questions you like were running concurrently. But I kind of like the concept of two or three at once to liven things up a bit. Then again I might spend too much time on just this one website.
United States
I like the 1 question at a time set up. It gives people a chance makes comments, and respond.
True. That could become a problem, especially if several questions you like were running concurrently. But I kind of like the concept of two or three at once to liven things up a bit. Then again I might spend too much time on just this one website.
good point
More more more! :)
20, 30, 100 questions at once.
Seriously. imho
Gray