We haven't received enough votes with gender data to show this graph yet.
We will show the graph as soon as we have enough votes!
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
That's interesting. 'Think it means (among other things) Iranians are REQUIRED to believe in the tenets of Islam? If so, then atheism is a capital crime?
ye it IS a capital crime....! if u believe in GOD and u are Muslim u shouldn't say somthing like that! but not like killing some one! if u murder some one u should be dead for killing someone and take him or her his or her life!
This is a purely conjectural (hypothetical) question: If you live in Iran but do not believe in God or you believe in something else (Hindu or Buddhist), is that a capital crime too?
we recognize them as legitimate religions but we believe that Islam is the best! islam want peace for every one and it Is Said in Qoran too but if some one wanna kill a muslim or some one else..he or she must be punished for murdering! that punishment must be Equal! we have Equal punishments for crimes! and he or she shod be killed!
Read Pulitzer prize winning author David Cay Johnston:
1. Perfectly legal
2. Free lunch.
you will then understand why bush's tax policies are criminal.
cato is a right wing mouth piece owned by the very people stealing, so of course they'd make up some pretty biased stuff. time for you to read from non biased investigators instead.
so let me get this straight. a right wing blogger with no experience at all but that maybe he can type, gets more credence than a multiple Pulitzer prize winning investigative reporter?
i'm sure, "LOL," that you would have been a happy nazi, proud of his ignorance. there is no respect for that. read the books, then learn something.
if they can be construed as partisan, its only because right wingers are basically wrong, or selfish, or greedy criminals... or some combination.
see, this is a typical problem with right wingers such as yourself.
The tax policies are thieving. they are stealing trillions from us that we must pay in interest. every single dollar bush gave as a tax cut had to be borrowed, because we were already in 6.5 trillion of debt the day he got into office. we were finally starting to pay down that debt under clinton, but bush took care of that immediately.
do you know how much it costs to borrow a dollar as the federal government? i bet you never bothered to figure that out since you're spending too much time making silly attacks on anybody who bothers to dig up the actual facts. and of course you won't find anybody disputing the facts from david cay johnston's books, because the numbers speak for themselves and come straight from the government, when its being truthful at least.
the fact is each borrowed dollar bush has spent, (and that means every dollar he has ever spent) costs $4.85 more in interest alone, just to pay back. that's an astounding amount to pay, just so that we can give tax cuts to people making more than $10 million a day. that's why his policies are thieving. everything bush does is to help some small group of cronies. you're not in one of those groups. so he has cost you dearly in ways you will never imagine.
but as a good nazi, you will not care what suffering you must endure. you would do well in burma, which is the endgame of rightwing rule... take a look at conditions there. its what your party wants for the whole world. 1-5 rich families, and billions in abject poverty. the right wing utopia.
how are you actually any different from them? blind from facts, violent, name calling, bigoted... can you really identify any differences between them and yourself? maybe you should change your ways if you're ashamed of your type.
so basically, you completely concede on all the facts. you have relegated your arguments to ad homonym attacks, that have nothing to do with the subject matter at hand, and so in the end, you will walk away, just as much a victim of the right wing economy destruction machine as you were before. you will have learned nothing, and you will still proudly imagine you're right, because you have done nothing to bother looking at the actual facts. your head is squarely in the sand.
I had already read those articles you referenced, when they actually came out. but you haven't read the books i suggested you read. it seems to me you'll have to read "1984" first, as a primer.
Slovakia
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyWho means it?
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyif he can provide better economy for the people of Usa...he would be a good one..! not like or stupid president Mr ahmadi nejad...we all hate him!
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyThat's interesting. 'Think it means (among other things) Iranians are REQUIRED to believe in the tenets of Islam? If so, then atheism is a capital crime?
ye it IS a capital crime....! if u believe in GOD and u are Muslim u shouldn't say somthing like that! but not like killing some one! if u murder some one u should be dead for killing someone and take him or her his or her life!
This is a purely conjectural (hypothetical) question: If you live in Iran but do not believe in God or you believe in something else (Hindu or Buddhist), is that a capital crime too?
I thought Muslims recognized Judaism and Christianity as legitimate religions?
That's why I gave Hindus and Buddhists as my examples. =]
no it is not a crime! we have christian and Judaism in our country and they live in peace. but Islam is our main one and lots of people have it!
we recognize them as legitimate religions but we believe that Islam is the best! islam want peace for every one and it Is Said in Qoran too but if some one wanna kill a muslim or some one else..he or she must be punished for murdering! that punishment must be Equal! we have Equal punishments for crimes! and he or she shod be killed!
if the ONLY thing obama does is reverse bush's thieving tax policies, everything will improve vastly.
he has a lot more than that he will do, so yes, i believe he will be astoundingly better than mcsame.
history has always shown the usa really excels when there's a democrat in charge. and coasts and falters under republicans.
This comment was deleted.
[-2 points] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyRead Pulitzer prize winning author David Cay Johnston:
1. Perfectly legal
2. Free lunch.
you will then understand why bush's tax policies are criminal.
cato is a right wing mouth piece owned by the very people stealing, so of course they'd make up some pretty biased stuff. time for you to read from non biased investigators instead.
This comment was deleted.
[-1 points] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyso let me get this straight. a right wing blogger with no experience at all but that maybe he can type, gets more credence than a multiple Pulitzer prize winning investigative reporter?
i'm sure, "LOL," that you would have been a happy nazi, proud of his ignorance. there is no respect for that. read the books, then learn something.
if they can be construed as partisan, its only because right wingers are basically wrong, or selfish, or greedy criminals... or some combination.
This comment was deleted.
[0 points] 4 years ago by deleted user Replysee, this is a typical problem with right wingers such as yourself.
The tax policies are thieving. they are stealing trillions from us that we must pay in interest. every single dollar bush gave as a tax cut had to be borrowed, because we were already in 6.5 trillion of debt the day he got into office. we were finally starting to pay down that debt under clinton, but bush took care of that immediately.
do you know how much it costs to borrow a dollar as the federal government? i bet you never bothered to figure that out since you're spending too much time making silly attacks on anybody who bothers to dig up the actual facts. and of course you won't find anybody disputing the facts from david cay johnston's books, because the numbers speak for themselves and come straight from the government, when its being truthful at least.
the fact is each borrowed dollar bush has spent, (and that means every dollar he has ever spent) costs $4.85 more in interest alone, just to pay back. that's an astounding amount to pay, just so that we can give tax cuts to people making more than $10 million a day. that's why his policies are thieving. everything bush does is to help some small group of cronies. you're not in one of those groups. so he has cost you dearly in ways you will never imagine.
but as a good nazi, you will not care what suffering you must endure. you would do well in burma, which is the endgame of rightwing rule... take a look at conditions there. its what your party wants for the whole world. 1-5 rich families, and billions in abject poverty. the right wing utopia.
This comment was deleted.
[-2 points] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyhow are you actually any different from them? blind from facts, violent, name calling, bigoted... can you really identify any differences between them and yourself? maybe you should change your ways if you're ashamed of your type.
This comment was deleted.
[0 points] 4 years ago by deleted user Replyso basically, you completely concede on all the facts. you have relegated your arguments to ad homonym attacks, that have nothing to do with the subject matter at hand, and so in the end, you will walk away, just as much a victim of the right wing economy destruction machine as you were before. you will have learned nothing, and you will still proudly imagine you're right, because you have done nothing to bother looking at the actual facts. your head is squarely in the sand.
This comment was deleted.
[0 points] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyI had already read those articles you referenced, when they actually came out. but you haven't read the books i suggested you read. it seems to me you'll have to read "1984" first, as a primer.