| Did you know about WTC7, the 3rd building to collapse on 9/11? And if so, why did it collapse? |
|
Did you know about WTC7, the 3rd building to collapse on 9/11? And if so, why did it collapse?
Click to vote
Canada
For those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
Fair way to put it, Pepe.
Please feel free to copy the poll it and ask again yourself. We need all the exposure we can get.
I am very curious why many more people aren't curious about this very curious event. And if not, what, simply, they think happened. So: good question you posed, and very openmindedly.
Most people don't want to know what happened. They want to ignore everything that doesn't fit with what they already think. Most people live with the comforting idea that their government is good, their government is there to protect them, their government would never hurt them. Parting away from this concept is often too difficult for most people so they just ignore it.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyFor those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
For those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
For those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
Has this same question not been asked like 5 times already?
Once only and I believe the votes were rigged so I am running it once again to verify.
I have never seen it get through to the poll, but I am new here.
For those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
For those interested here is a compilation of all the available videos of World Trade Center Building Seven (WTC7) collapsing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0GW6QXKyp0
ok, pepe. I watched the video I know that they lie. I know that they have done things to the American people. What I don't know is why that building came down. I don't know alot about demo but I have seen some. Enough to know that it looks very much like someone brought down that building. So what do you want to come from this, answers? Or just for people to open their eyes and KNOW they are being lied to?
I'll jump in here for pepe, since he hasn't responded. An informed republic is the only chance we have. World shaking (and Constitution shredding) events have been perpetrated, based on the events of this one day. I can't think of anything more important to get right. The more people know this, the more likely we are to not move toward a needless police state. And that IS what happens if people let it, and that is what has been happening since then. Slowly but surely.
>> ok, pepe. I watched the video I
>> know that they lie. I know that
>> they have done things to the
>> American people.
What's important to realize is not that your own gubment is lying to you. After all lying is what politicians have always done. But what you have to realize is that your media, the entirety of your media (TV, newspapers, mags, radios) are all lying to you. They are all very very careful of never letting you know about that collapse of WTC7 ..... why is that? In fact Rosie O'Donnell mentioned WTC-7 frequently on The View and she was forced to leave the show soon after.
>> What I don't know is why that
>> building came down.
Inside WTC7 was the emergency operation bunker. Most likely the entire operation of 9/11 was orchestrated in that bunker. It also hosted the offices of the CIA, FBI, SEC and several banks. there was a very large amount of files regarding criminal investigations for large corporate companies such as Enron and others ..... all those cases disappeared on that day with the collapse of WTC-7
>> I don't know alot about demo but I
>> have seen some. Enough to know that
>> it looks very much like someone
>> brought down that building.
Well, you are no expert, so let's ask a demolition expert what that collapse looks like.Danny Jowenko (CD expert) commenting on his observations of why WTC7 fell. From Dutch TV show Zembla:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI
>> So what do you want to come from
>> this, answers?
Here is what I want. A seven hours long documentary, watch it:
Part one:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4675077383139148549
Part two:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1158343264447729869&q=ring+of+power+part+2&total=119&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
That WTC7 came down is known. That it came down due to fire damage is known. The source of the fire, whether pre-planted explosives or collateral damage from the Towers, is unknown.
FIre damage has never brought down a steel structure building in all of history. And certainly not at free fall speed!
OOps. Meant to say: "Fire damage has never brought down a steel structure building in all of history, except for the three that supposed did on that one day, incredibly enough."
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyOK, so we will moved away from the obvious demolition of WTC7 and on to WTC1 and 2.... Do you mean to say that these two buildings completely failed within 14 seconds (slowest reported speed I ever read: and still far closer to free-fall speed than a progressive collapse could possibly have been, which some models show would actually STOP within a few floors of falling, because of all the structure below unaffected by any fire, plane, etc.), failing completely because of ... what? I don't think anyone claiming that explosives are the only possible way these buildings could have come down the way they did has said that they were made of reinforced concrete. That is old technology. On the other hand, the floors were far from "column-free" (please watch any of the many videos available that show footage of the towers being built to see how erroneous this notion is). So how DID the 47 massive vertical support columns in each building virtually disappear if it was a pancake collapse like many like to imagine? Like records on a spindle, there spindle should have remained at least temporarily.
There is just too much evidence to the contrary to let the official story stand. A new investigation, or I should say, a real investigation into the biggest crime in the US is needed. But – somehow this does not seem to be something the administration is interested in. (Yes, how odd.) Anyway, for those who are interested, the science has already been done, and can be found all over the net, proving that 9-11 was in fact an inside job. The more you read the more you will know. I challenge you to read David Ray Griffin’s response book, Debunking 9-11 Debunking, if you think Popular Mechanics’ has even a shred of truth to it.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user Reply>> I have not once seen a model that
>> could suggest that once the top of
>> the buildings were in motion that
>> they would ever stop without total
>> collapse. Suggesting otherwise is
>> sheer lunacy. The building was
>> simply not designed to absorb that
>> kind of abuse.
Here is what I suggest you do:
Build a tower in your backyard. You can use anything you want, build it out of LEGO blocks, or a stack of pizza boxes, or Genga blocks, or Popsicle sticks, or empty pop cans glued together, or empty egg crates taped together, or you an even make it out of pancakes if you want ...... anything you want really. But if the tower is a foot across, make sure it's at least 5 foot tall, that way it's somewhat in proportion with the WTC7 tower.
Gouge in on one side of the tower, gouge into it as deep as you want but do it only on one side of the tower. Then set fire to it, you can use jet fuel or diesel if you want. But set fire to it to only the one side that is gouged up.
So can you visualize it now? A 5 foot pizza box tower with a gouge on one side and fire on that one side.
Watch it burn and see if you can find any possible way that the tower collapses down perfectly vertically straight down, not falling over to one side - STRAIGHT DOWN.
You can try as many times as you want with any different tower design you want but you will never be able to make it go straight down into itself. Eventually it will fall over like a three but it won't "pancake" down into itself.
Next, if you succeed to do this, try and start a fire in your backyard, use jet fuel or kerosene or car gas or propane or wood or anything else you want. But make sure that fire burns as hot as possible. Then put a piece of steel in it and watch the piece of steel melt. It will simply not ever melt - EVER. But somehow molten steel was found under all 3 buildings weeks later. Now if open flame fires can not melt steel, how did that molten steel get there? What melted that steel?
You can look in the FEMA report or in the NIST report of in the 9/11 commission report but what you will find is that they all don't mention the molten steel. Why do you think that they make like the molten steel didn't exist?
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user Reply>> That WTC7 came down is known.
Actually according to this here poll, almost half the population don't know about WTC7. In fact when Rosie O'Donnell started to talk about WTC-7 on The View she was let go within a few weeks ..... why do you think that is?
>> That it came down due to fire
>> damage is known.
Actually the oh-fishy-all story is that it came down due to both the "raging intense fires" and the damage from fallen debris. But the intense fires must have been on the South side of the building because all other sides show very little fires. And of course the debris damage was also strictly on the South side. So how is it that a building with fire damage and debris damage on only one side falls down PERFECTLY VERTICALLY inside 6.5 seconds almost into it's own footprint?
>> The source of the fire, whether
>> pre-planted explosives or
>> collateral damage from the Towers,
>> is unknown.
What we do know is that the fires were started an hour BEFORE either towers collapsed. See here for more details:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc1PJq8ESIA
And in fact, here on the left bottom corner you can see fires inside WTC7 before the two towers collapsed:
http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/wtc-30_1_small.jpg
So how is it that WTC-7 caught fire without anything having hit it just yet?
But most importantly, molten steel was found in the basement of WTC-7 weeks later still burning hot and flowing. If fuel fires are not hot enough to melt steel, what caused that steel to literally melt for weeks after the fact?
Strangely enough NIST, FEMA and 9/11 Commission all try to pretend that no molten steel was ever found under any of the buildings .... why is that?
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyGood question. Thank you! ^_^
Pepe, thanks for the question. Only a little more than one in four seems to be convinced by the official line. A surprising number still never heard of it!
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 4 years ago by deleted user ReplyI will post a question: Do you agree with hypothesis that 9/11 was an inside job? I am very curious how many Americans will vote for yes.