Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
Sure thing, Jonapril. Keep typing your BS. TruBlu, lt, bobaknob, and your other cast of characters. I wish Waugs was here as I can see him crucifying you with the "Norman! Get me a sandwich!".
"John Warnock Hinckley, Jr. (born May 29, 1955) attempted to assassinate U.S. President Ronald Reagan in Washington, D.C. on March 30, 1981, as the culmination of an effort to impress actress Jodie Foster. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and has remained under institutional psychiatric care since then."
Yep. Basically he said that he did it because Reagan needed killing. And he thought Jodie Foster thought so too. He would impress her enough that she would love him for it.
I was comparing her statement to John Hinkley's assertion that the President needed killing.
Just prior to Hinckley's failed attempt on Reagan's life, he wrote to Foster:
“Over the past seven months I've left you dozens of poems, letters and love messages in the faint hope that you could develop an interest in me. Although we talked on the phone a couple of times I never had the nerve to simply approach you and introduce myself. [...] the reason I'm going ahead with this attempt now is because I cannot wait any longer to impress you.”
Doesn't sound like anything dauguy would say at all. Couldn't you pick another assassin to draw a better connection?
Is it expensive to pay for someone to live in prison? Is it expensive for a lethal injection? We should do whatever's cheaper - for the good of the flock.
It's cheaper to stone them to death. The stones are free, and I'm sure we could find some volenteers will to throw them in a loud and disorderly manner.
United Kingdom
Generally, life in prison over the death penalty. Though I feel like some extremely heinous acts deserve the death penalty.
Like invading a country under false pretenses?
This comment was deleted.
[4 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyThis comment was deleted.
[-5 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyHow's theraphy going?
This comment was deleted.
[6 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyThis comment was deleted.
[-3 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplySure thing, Jonapril. Keep typing your BS. TruBlu, lt, bobaknob, and your other cast of characters. I wish Waugs was here as I can see him crucifying you with the "Norman! Get me a sandwich!".
ROTFLMAO. LOL. How juvenile. Maybe you ARE 14.
translate - You can quit implying that Bush should be shot. Clean up poison on isle 3!
This comment was deleted.
[2 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyOh, lets not imply it.
Bush should be shot.
Why do you sound like John Hinkley?
This guy??
"John Warnock Hinckley, Jr. (born May 29, 1955) attempted to assassinate U.S. President Ronald Reagan in Washington, D.C. on March 30, 1981, as the culmination of an effort to impress actress Jodie Foster. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and has remained under institutional psychiatric care since then."
Yep. Basically he said that he did it because Reagan needed killing. And he thought Jodie Foster thought so too. He would impress her enough that she would love him for it.
I was comparing her statement to John Hinkley's assertion that the President needed killing.
Just prior to Hinckley's failed attempt on Reagan's life, he wrote to Foster:
“Over the past seven months I've left you dozens of poems, letters and love messages in the faint hope that you could develop an interest in me. Although we talked on the phone a couple of times I never had the nerve to simply approach you and introduce myself. [...] the reason I'm going ahead with this attempt now is because I cannot wait any longer to impress you.”
Doesn't sound like anything dauguy would say at all. Couldn't you pick another assassin to draw a better connection?
Because you didn't get what I said.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
Seems pretty clear to me.
See? You didn't get it.
This comment has been moderated down. (Show Comment)
ask001 - You can quit implying that Bush should be shot. That sounds like some of translate's poison.
Is it expensive to pay for someone to live in prison? Is it expensive for a lethal injection? We should do whatever's cheaper - for the good of the flock.
It's cheaper to stone them to death. The stones are free, and I'm sure we could find some volenteers will to throw them in a loud and disorderly manner.
Why not do away with trials entirely? How about lynch mobs? They're cheap.
Tee. Hee.
For me or you SuperFly?
You.
I'll opt for a few hours community service - or a chat with one of your beautiful social workers.
This comment was deleted.
[1 point] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyWho?