They had there place but are hurting the American worker by trying to play hard ball.
15%15 Votes
Unions are the back bone of the American work force and are still needed.
34%33 Votes
Yes they are helping.
24%24 Votes
No they are hurting.
27%26 Votes
They had there place but are hurting the American worker by trying to play hard ball.
15%15 Votes
Unions are the back bone of the American work force and are still needed.
Male
Female
24%12 Votes
Yes they are helping.
28%14 Votes
No they are hurting.
32%16 Votes
They had there place but are hurting the American worker by trying to play hard ball.
16%8 Votes
Unions are the back bone of the American work force and are still needed.
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500People. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
Sign Up or Login
Sorry, this data is only available to users with an account.
But why do unions keep trying to get better wages for there people when they know that it hurts the companies that are employing the members?
Unions are the reason why companies are moving jobs out of the US or to right to work states. If the union bosses would spend more time working with the companies instead of fighting them they would help keep jobs where they are.
At one time Unions were run by the workers and the rules where meant to be for the workers. Today, a lot of unions are just corrupt parasites who play politics with the workers, pit the workers against management, and suck the profit from the company while limiting workers upward mobility. Now instead of having one boss, some workers have found they have two that they have to support.
I am not overly pro union but the more I learn about economics the more it points to the fact that without labor unions there is no or very little middle class.
Any country that has a middle class can trace it back to the rise in labor unions. It also looks like the decline in unions (for some of the reasons stated above) has caused the erosion of the middle class and has increased the gap between them and the upper class.
Drop in real income for American workers parallels drop in union membership.
That is true.
But why do unions keep trying to get better wages for there people when they know that it hurts the companies that are employing the members?
Unions are the reason why companies are moving jobs out of the US or to right to work states. If the union bosses would spend more time working with the companies instead of fighting them they would help keep jobs where they are.
At one time Unions were run by the workers and the rules where meant to be for the workers. Today, a lot of unions are just corrupt parasites who play politics with the workers, pit the workers against management, and suck the profit from the company while limiting workers upward mobility. Now instead of having one boss, some workers have found they have two that they have to support.
This comment was deleted.
[-8 points] 2 years ago by deleted user ReplyNo problem B.
Well said jon.
I am not overly pro union but the more I learn about economics the more it points to the fact that without labor unions there is no or very little middle class.
Any country that has a middle class can trace it back to the rise in labor unions. It also looks like the decline in unions (for some of the reasons stated above) has caused the erosion of the middle class and has increased the gap between them and the upper class.