Are scientists who suggest climate change is associated with human activities ...
(Please click one)
Cancel
|
|
||||
|
|
- 11 Comments
Loading...
- 22 People Online
- 100 Votes
...and 0 Guests
Results by Country
Results by Voter Type
Community votes are collected from you and other visitors to Ask500. Independent votes are collected from visitors to hundreds of other websites around the world.
| Results | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Lying because they want to change capitalism or Western democracy | |
|
|
|
| 2 votes 2% | |
| Mistaken because they've misinterpreted the data | |
|
|
|
| 12 votes 12% | |
| Correct | |
|
|
|
| 75 votes 75% | |
| Lying because they want more money from environmentalists or governments | |
|
|
|
| 11 votes 11% | |


Geez... do you think you could make answers that are more politically charged? Why beat around the bush?
You mean the Bush
Well yes, I could - lack of space forced me to leave out my favourite conspiracy "They're lying to bring about one World Government under the AntiChrist"
They maybe right, they maybe wrong, and they may or may not have personal biases to there assertion. Man made global warming has neither been proven or disproven with any scientific degree of certainly.
Neither has gravity or evolution been "proven with certainty." That's what a scientific "theory" means. The best explanation that fits the data. From that standpoint all three are pretty certain.
That's not what scientific "theory" means, sorry.
Actually, it is. From the Random House Unabridged Dictionary: "A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity."
Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying. Most folks get that backward. Apologies.
Indeed they do. The word most people mean when they say, "theory," is "hypothesis." ;o)
They maybe right, they maybe wrong, and they may or may not have personal biases to there assertion. Man made global warming has neither been proven or disproven with any scientific degree of certainly.
Is there an echo in here?