I think what's going on here is that she thinks her response, "Anyone can be hypocritical, it is not a weakness unique only to the religious by any means," somehow refutes my assertion that all religious people are hypocrites. I believe she thinks her statement actually says that not all religious people are hypocrites, but in fact it agrees with my assertion, while widening the scope.
She got caught in what was probably a misspeak and is now fighting an imaginary argument, rather than admitting she fucked up. She's not usually this much of an idiot, so that's the best explanation I can come up with.
[1 point]4 hours ago by translateReplyEdited 4 hours ago by translate
You did not point out a flaw in what I said. If you think you did, you're a moron.
What you said was that the quality that I said all religious people share is not limited to just religious people. That's fine and that's absolutely true, but so fucking what? It has absolutely nothing to do with my point or the general topic of this question, which is religious people and hypocrisy.
You never challenged my assertion that all religious people are hypocrites. Instead you berated me for not extending the scope of hypocrisy to include other people in addition to religious folks. I didn't do that because that's not what we're talking about, but nothing I said implied that ONLY religious are hypocrites. That's what you attacked me for. That's fucked up.
Man, you've totally lost it. Am I being punk'd or something? You are trying to manufacture an argument here - why, I have no idea. You just like to hear yourself argue, maybe. If that's not the case, and you actually think what your saying is valid, then you're an idiot. I actually had some respect for your intelligence once, why you choose to squander it on this ridiculous bullshit is really perplexing.
[1 point]4 hours ago by translateReplyEdited 4 hours ago by translate
Pirate 
United States
translate's Recent Comments See all 4000
I think what's going on here is that she thinks her response, "Anyone can be hypocritical, it is not a weakness unique only to the religious by any means," somehow refutes my assertion that all religious people are hypocrites. I believe she thinks her statement actually says that not all religious people are hypocrites, but in fact it agrees with my assertion, while widening the scope.
She got caught in what was probably a misspeak and is now fighting an imaginary argument, rather than admitting she fucked up. She's not usually this much of an idiot, so that's the best explanation I can come up with.
"I never saw him immediately agreeing that I was right"
Why would I? I NEVER DISAGREED with it. I never expressed or implied disagreement. You made that shit up, looking for an argument.
You did not point out a flaw in what I said. If you think you did, you're a moron.
What you said was that the quality that I said all religious people share is not limited to just religious people. That's fine and that's absolutely true, but so fucking what? It has absolutely nothing to do with my point or the general topic of this question, which is religious people and hypocrisy.
You never challenged my assertion that all religious people are hypocrites. Instead you berated me for not extending the scope of hypocrisy to include other people in addition to religious folks. I didn't do that because that's not what we're talking about, but nothing I said implied that ONLY religious are hypocrites. That's what you attacked me for. That's fucked up.
Man, you've totally lost it. Am I being punk'd or something? You are trying to manufacture an argument here - why, I have no idea. You just like to hear yourself argue, maybe. If that's not the case, and you actually think what your saying is valid, then you're an idiot. I actually had some respect for your intelligence once, why you choose to squander it on this ridiculous bullshit is really perplexing.