Ask500

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Nate does some good analysis at fivethirtyeight. Seems likely that they will hold at least 50 seats in the Senate but lose control of the House.

haha your'e lost in a jungle...I feel like I'm doing this wrong.

Taylor, without question.

I don't think I've been there since they changed the name from Boston Chicken.

I believe this sufficiently answers the question:

http://xkcd.com/314/

Moving to California for grad school next year. Why thank you, I would like equal rights. Anxious for this case to come in front of the Supreme Court.

I'm pretty sure I don't need to cite any sources when I say accidental handgun shooting deaths >> accidental screwdriver...stabbing...deaths.

http://abstrusegoose.com/277

replace he with she. sorry.

I really do wonder if you are trying to misinterpret everything dauguy says.

He at no point stated that he had anything to do with liberals. He was suggesting that liberals, too, often point to a decrease in unemployment rate during a recession as a bad sign, saying people are giving up looking jobs; however, they do so under Republican presidents, while the conservatives which are pointing this out now, are doing so under a Democratic president. I assume he was trying to point out the irony.

Personally, I'm not sure if this is the driving force behind the lowering of unemployment. The three people close to me that lost their jobs last year have since found new jobs. I realize that it is useless to try to generalize for the American economy as a whole by giving an example about a local economy, but just giving my two cents.