I haven't watched commercials since the invention of the VCR, except for live events like sports, which the DVR fixed. So, answer D applies; I have no idea what is being advertised these days, except on Hulu.
[1 point]80 days ago by SeamusReplyEdited 80 days ago by Seamus
Agreed that it is common, although there are many motives for murder. But when the question is about what qualifies someone to be something, a parallel construction involving something else must also be about qualifications; whether the two topics have tangential similarities is rather irrelevant.
We could just as easily compare the question to "People who like people because they are friendly are friendly." Who would argue the transformation is valid because some racists occasionally act friendly toward some people? If the transformation is valid, it is for other reasons.
[1 point]93 days ago by SeamusReplyEdited 93 days ago by Seamus
Seamus's Recent Comments See all 37
I haven't watched commercials since the invention of the VCR, except for live events like sports, which the DVR fixed. So, answer D applies; I have no idea what is being advertised these days, except on Hulu.
Another tautology, with which I have already agreed. But again, not of parallel construction to the original question.
Agreed that it is common, although there are many motives for murder. But when the question is about what qualifies someone to be something, a parallel construction involving something else must also be about qualifications; whether the two topics have tangential similarities is rather irrelevant.
We could just as easily compare the question to "People who like people because they are friendly are friendly." Who would argue the transformation is valid because some racists occasionally act friendly toward some people? If the transformation is valid, it is for other reasons.