Gimme a freakin' break! Aaron was asking me not to ask the question over and over repeatedly twice a day ..... that was 259 days ago and now I post the same question again ..... 269 days later and you are bitching about it?
So you are right, it was demolished with explosives. But do you really believe they found a bunch of demolition experts, several tons of explosives and sent these guys with explosives in hand into a burning building? ... would you walk into a fire with a stick of dynamite in your hand?
The reality is that explosives where placed there BEFORE 9/11 ... have a look here for more information:
> you should know that without that compelling evidence I mentioned again and again, you wont change mine.
It always amazes me when people look at the perfectly vertical demolition of WTC7 and still ask for more evidence. WTC7 is the smoking gun dude. You remind me of my buddy and his wife: every time I go over to their house she is all over me, she flirts, grabs my ass, makes sexual innuendos and she has slept with many of my other friends. But my buddy keeps saying she's just friendly and a joker ..... he just doesn't want to see the truth. No matter how much she cheaps on him, he just refuses to see what's going on..... you behave pretty much in the same manner when you tell me that WTC7 fell down due to fires and falling debris.
The truth would just be too painful for my buddy so he just blocks it out ..... seems the truth just would be too painful for you too my friend.
All is well, I bid you farewell my friend and I hope some day, the obvious can make it into your hearth.
Canada
Pepelapiu's Recent Comments See all 328
Gimme a freakin' break! Aaron was asking me not to ask the question over and over repeatedly twice a day ..... that was 259 days ago and now I post the same question again ..... 269 days later and you are bitching about it?
Very good, now let's have a look at what a controlled demolition expert thought when he first saw the videos as you did:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc
So you are right, it was demolished with explosives. But do you really believe they found a bunch of demolition experts, several tons of explosives and sent these guys with explosives in hand into a burning building? ... would you walk into a fire with a stick of dynamite in your hand?
The reality is that explosives where placed there BEFORE 9/11 ... have a look here for more information:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1337231563159418946
> you should know that without that compelling evidence I mentioned again and again, you wont change mine.
It always amazes me when people look at the perfectly vertical demolition of WTC7 and still ask for more evidence. WTC7 is the smoking gun dude. You remind me of my buddy and his wife: every time I go over to their house she is all over me, she flirts, grabs my ass, makes sexual innuendos and she has slept with many of my other friends. But my buddy keeps saying she's just friendly and a joker ..... he just doesn't want to see the truth. No matter how much she cheaps on him, he just refuses to see what's going on..... you behave pretty much in the same manner when you tell me that WTC7 fell down due to fires and falling debris.
The truth would just be too painful for my buddy so he just blocks it out ..... seems the truth just would be too painful for you too my friend.
All is well, I bid you farewell my friend and I hope some day, the obvious can make it into your hearth.
Cheers,
PepeLapiu :)
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread142784/pg1