Ask500

I don't see it that way. O'Reilly and Limbaugh are basically giving marching orders and talking points for their political vision. While in the Dems circumstance they are using entertainers as a draw to fund raising events. On the Dems side there is mild amusement a slight ridicule for the opinions of entertainers in politics.

oh and by the way what does employing entertainer as a fundraising technique have to do with being lead around the nose by people like Rash Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly?

yes obama has spent more than bush did but most of bushes uncontrolled spending was at his own discretion, i.e. the war in iraq. based on historical evidence during other financial crisis' world wide the stimulus spend should be beneficial and allow us to shorten the duration of recovery dramatically. that doesn't mean it will but that the best evidence we have recommends this course of action.

frankly i agree with the idea that we are spending too much except that how do you stop spending and recover quickly from this financial crisis.

some quotes

http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-10-racist-limbaugh-quotes/

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1147

On the topic of the tea parties stance I would say the proof is in the pudding. While Bush Jr. was in office there was insane spending but no one complained. But as soon as a black man got into office there was suddenly a new movement in america, spearheaded by racist right wing pundits, who purports to be mad about spending. I have never believed their rhetoric for a second. The war cry of too much spending is a sham to disguise their fear of anyone who doesn't look like them.

Finally i don't think the Dems are doing an amazing job but at least they are trying to improve things in a structured manner and we have some respect back in the geo-political arena.

i think the question is more about the views of the tea party and how they present themselves. I have to say that whenever i hear anyone at a tea party rally speak what i get out of it is that they are angry because they don't believe Obama is qualified to be our leader because he is black. I can understand their ire about having to be lead by someone they don't believe in. Everyone else has suffered in that situation for the previous 8 years except that our reason for not trusting the president was cause he essentially was essentially a delusional idiot. I will have no respect for the tea party until they stop being a mob lead around by television and radio entertainers who fashion themselves as political pundits.

i think the word you were looking for was "Which" not "Witch"

because we have yet to develop viable interstellar travel. IF we can survive about few centuries we might do to the stars and find that we are not alone. BUT until we can circumvent the speed of light we will only have earth. WHY, because that is where we evolved.

yes. the republican are waging war on the poor and middle class, exactly. the bush administration has been one long fiasco of changing the laws of this country to favor big business and corruptions to the detriment of the poor and the middle class.

i wasn't really attacking anyone. merely pointing out that from a certain perspective the quote is accurate. as i said i am totally perplexed by this god thing and find it rather hateful that there is a group of people who believe that i will be punished for that. I don't believe they will be punished for not believing in quantum physics.

oh also i hate you for believing in god.. HAHA. but really belief in god is a total mystery to me and seems like people should throw out god about the same time they stop believing in the easter bunny, santa clause and the stork. I mean give usd all a break, INVISIBLE SKY WIZARD?