Ask500

I don't think this is actually possible. Once you have any regulation, you'll curtail freedoms. Some of the freedoms may be worth giving up for the security, but by the very definition, a rule or law is designed to curb one's freedom.

Those are all questions you'd have to pose for yourself. If you don't have a pet, just imagine what kind of pet you would get right now. Let's assume a terminal disease or aggressive cancer where there is little hope of treating it.

Better than I did, I clocked in right at 28 seconds.

Now that you've voted, how long are you actually able to hold your breath? http://stopwatch.onlineclock.net/

It tastes mostly like beef, but is leaner and has about a 1/3rd of the calories. It's probably the most healthy meat, but you have to have an adventurous pallet.

Perhaps even more importantly, what would be the perfect temperature that you would select?

Yeah, but I bet you still wouldn't eat him. Now if he was a nice juicy goat on the other hand . . .

Let's give them the same conversation skills that people on Ask500 have.

You could always just opt to only kill the ones trying to drive you insane.

I don't think it's all that simplistic. Look at prop 19 that California is trying to pass. It's basically just as vague. The idea would be that each community could choose how they felt on this law instead of there being an outright ban. As far as what type of files would be allowed . . . this would be kind of irrelevant. Whether it's a photo or a movie, the intellectual property rights are the same. Not sure why this would need to be done on a federal level. I actually think it would have a greater chance of success at the state level where the people could put it on a ballot for a vote vs. waiting for an elected represented to turn down all the cash that the entertainment industry hands out.